Saturday, December 11, 2010

Soon We'll All Be ONE and Soros Will Be Proud



Notice at :52 how the data shows that whites are far less likely than other groups to marry outside their race. You wouldn't know that from the images they keep showing of smiling white celebs paired up with blacks. (The celeb thing is to make it look cool).

Nor does this stop them from adopting such a self-righteous tone at 1:51, claiming:

"The overall headline is that color lines are becoming more blurred....AND THAT'S GOOD NEWS!"

Translation: From this "news outlet" you have something dressed up as news which turns out to be nothing but pure racemixing propaganda.

Why don't they just cut right to the chase and say: "We sincerely hope whites soon get genocided out of existence. Please adopt the mating patterns shown here to hasten the obliteration of white genes worldwide so we can have our liberal paradise where everyone is the same and no one embarrassingly excels intellectually anymore. Thank you. Good evening and good night."

Boycott: ABC. Turn it off and leave it off. You might as well do the same to CNN, MSNBC, CBS, and NBC, too, because they all spout the same New World Order bullshit. It'll give you more time for more productive pursuits anyway.

15 comments:

  1. When I say television commercials I meant forms of media that somehow are offensive to crazy people that think white people are being put humiliated.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "When I say television commercials I meant forms of media that somehow are offensive to crazy people that think white people are being put humiliated."

    Huh? Is this supposed to be intelligible ?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow, you are REALLY terrified of black men stealing your hot blond females (apparently brunette females do not warrant your concern, based on the ads you've chosen).

    Unfortunately, I don't think you have too much to worry about. At least on dating sites like OK Cupid, black males and most minority males have a much harder time getting responses than white males. In fact, white males are the most desired race by pretty much all females.
    http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/your-race-affects-whether-people-write-you-back/

    But I'm a white chick, and for me, black men ARE actually the sexiest. You know how Brazilian girls are especially hot? It's like that. Black men just look better - it's the high levels of testosterone. Sorry, sometimes biology's a bitch.

    That said, I'd rather have an intelligent, nice, interesting, non-racist guy, no matter what color he is. Somehow, though, I don't think you fit that bill either. Peace.

    ReplyDelete
  4. We don't care about brunette women because ALL brunettes are actually niggers! Die in Hell, race traitor!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bloody nauseating stuff.

    crimesofthetimes.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  6. Interesting! Nobody says that China or Africa is becoming a melting pot! Only whites are told it's "good news" to be a "melting pot." This is GENOCIDE. It's an attempt to genocide only whites.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wow, white women are pretty desparate. They'll still end up in an apartment with six cats.

    ReplyDelete
  8. crimesofthetimes:

    Thanks, I put in a link to your site on the home page.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "Wow, you are REALLY terrified of black men stealing your hot blond..."

    Not really "terrified." We're just sick of seeing it in the media. Just sick of the attempt at manipulation, sick of the social engineering.

    We're only really "terrified" that failure to effectively fight back will eventually lead to this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8zNsUTWsOc&feature=related

    ReplyDelete
  10. "obliteration of white genes"

    There are no such things as 'white genes'. If you want to prove me wrong, tell me precisely which genes make someone white. I guarantee you that whatever genes you pick, I can find you plenty of people you would classify as 'white' who do not carry these genes, and plenty of people you would classify as 'non-white' who do carry these genes.

    Also, genes do not get 'obliterated'. This is why traits can skip generations but still get passed down; the genes were there all along.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "There are no such things as 'white genes'"

    Of course there are. The genetic combinations of people whose ancestors are from Europe will have them. The genetic combinations of people from Africa will not have them. Why is this hard to understand?

    If you need to see a visual representation, it looks like this:

    http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/partitioning_intra_and_inter_racial_genetic_variation/

    ReplyDelete
  12. Drop dead nigger.

    ReplyDelete
  13. "The genetic combinations of people whose ancestors are from Europe will have them. The genetic combinations of people from Africa will not have them."

    You are pre-defining your categories ("Europe", "Africa", etc.) and then sorting the data according to these categories. I could pre-define all kinds of categories (e.g. blood groups) and get corresponding genetic combinations. I could divide people according to blood group if I wanted, and then quote research papers about blood group and IQ or blood group and crime rates, and call myself a 'blood group realist', and get angry at women of my blood group marrying men not of my blood group and call them 'blood group traitors', and it would make about as much sense as what you guys do all the time.

    ReplyDelete
  14. "I could pre-define all kinds of categories"

    You could. And I am sure you often do. In life we call this "cognition." It's quite handy.

    ReplyDelete
  15. "You are pre-defining your categories"
    race is mostly based on gene frequencies not unique genes. Once you count enough genes you will ALWAYS be more closely related to somebody of the same race. And these other categories like blood groups and iq and crime rates, guess what? they are are correlated with race. And no we are not pre-defining categories, its called subspecies.

    ReplyDelete