Thursday, December 22, 2011
[Pardon for the recent lull. Holidays, you know.]
Today we feature a form of Anti-White Media that we have heretofore neglected: the diversity training video.
Many of us have been forced to watch them when taking a new job. Has anyone ever noticed how over-the-top Anti-White they are?
What this video doesn't tell you, but which is clear from the production company's website, is that the non-whites it features are for the most part professional "diversity" consultants.
The most hostile man here, the colorfully dressed, mixed-race guy, Mr. Victor Lewis, has made a living airing Anti-White grievances. Therefore his spiel about the white guy "standing on the shoulders" of other races is likely scripted; it is probably a point he has made (and was likely paid to make) in front of audiences hundreds of times.
Meanwhile, the white guy they gang up on is just your average Joe. He's not a professional advocate for white interests. He just runs a shop.
So here we have professional race hustlers and "diversity trainers" picking on this one white fall-guy. They put him on trial. Even the black guy he's sitting next to, who acts as his lawyer, turns on him.
But if I had been in the room, I would have had to remind them that just about every race there had at one time gone through an expansionist phase. For instance, one of the men next to Mr. Lewis looks like he could be a Mongolian. Why doesn't Mr. Lewis turn threateningly towards the Mongolian man and tell how he "stood on the shoulders of," enslaved, dominated and decimated the white people of the Russian Steppe for hundreds of years? If the man happened to be Japanese, Mr. Lewis could have complained how the man's ancestors enslaved the Koreans for thousands of years.
In fact, Mr. Lewis himself looks vaguely like Muammar Gaddafi. He could easily be part Arab or Moor. But he doesn't turn to himself and say: You know, self, for hundreds of years you harassed all your neighbors; you killed and enslaved the Indo-European Persians; you converted them at the point of a sword to your oppressive religion; you conquered and killed and converted the people of Spain; you harried all weaker and less organized tribes, enslaved them when you could and justified that enslavement with your not-very-PC religious text, the Koran. Indeed, you have historically dominated your own women, who to this day are far less likely than a white European woman to maintain any sense of independence.
I could go on with critiques of Mr. Lewis, and shall: he singles out the white guy for such particular scorn, blaming him for the alleged wrongs of the white race as a whole. But, to be fair, does he ever think to thank him for the things that the white race has done for him? Has given him? The clothes he is wearing, as Afro-licious as they appear, were made in a textile mill invented by white people. Books, in which he studied to learn how to hate white people, were invented by white people. He probably drove to the film set in a car, invented by white people. And the camera that was used to spread his message of hating white people was invented by white people.
He cries and moans about how North America was taken from red people by white people. But why, then, is he in North America? Who is keeping him here? It's the 21st century, Mr. Lewis. You can get on a plane (invented by white people) and move back to the Sudan, where you look to be from. Oh, but then how would you earn your bread, Mr. Lewis? For then in the Sudan, who would pay you to complain about white people?
Don't mean to burst your bubble, Mr. Lewis, but there in the Sudan you would find people who look a lot like you, people who are currently in the process of raping and murdering and marauding their weaker, darker neighbors. Not a single victim-pimping race-hustling seminar within a thousand miles! How on earth would you then manage to pump yourself up with your high-and-mighty speechifying? How on earth would you continue to spin the narrative of your moral superiority?
I mean, there are lots and lots of ways to counter Mr. Lewis' impassioned argument that aren't, as he claims, merely efforts to "mystify" this issue. If anything, Mr. Lewis is the one doing the mystifying. His raised voice, threatening posture, and harsh tone all serve to take the discussion out of the realm of facts and logic, and push it into the realm of coercion, which is precisely where the makers of this film want to take it.
One more thing: this idea that blacks are somehow morally righteous because they never were imperialistic or colonialist is pure hogwash on so many levels. For one, don't all the PC history texts talk about how we all come from Africa? So if people who are descended from Africans live all over the world, doesn't that mean that at some point Africans were expansionist, and displaced the other human species? Seems kinda contradictory that we are constantly encouraged to celebrate the fact that "we're all from Africa" but fail to heap upon those expansionist Africans the same scorn we reserve for those expansionist Europeans.
Furthermore, the fact that Africans failed to expand like Europeans did in modern times has nothing to do with some kind of innate virtue among blacks. I mean, it wasn't like blacks thought of taking North America for themselves and then chose not to because like peace-loving little Dalai Lamas they thought it would be "disrespectful" to take the lands of other tribes. No. Everybody knows they didn't expand on their own because they couldn't get their act together, technologically speaking. If they could have, you know they would have. Had they been able to construct the Viking longship, they would have made it to Nova Scotia, too. This bitching and moaning about white colonialism is just displaced envy.
This video, claiming to be about encouraging "diversity," actually only trains us how to hate white people.
Monday, December 12, 2011
Mormonism has been morphing for over a century. In the 1890s, the church officially gave up the practice of polygamy so that Utah could gain statehood. That's right: they compromised their belief system for political expediency. They did it again in the 1970s, when blacks were suddenly made eligible to hold the Mormon priesthood.
Now the church is going out of its way to promote interracial breeding. The eye-catching hook to both of these ads (at 1:22 and 2:21 respectively): "Surprise! You thought we were a bunch of racists, but Mormons love blacks too!"
Notice, then, how each time the church has taken steps to become more "mainstream" it increasingly spells the demise of white homogeneity?
Behold Mormonism transformed: from a 19th century religion that embraced polygamy (and was thus essentially one big white baby making machine) to a 21st century, globalist, New World Order mega-corporation that actively promotes race-mixing. What a 180-degree turnaround!
Modern Mormons are trying to show that they aren't racists, and in doing so they're adopting the mindset of the Anti-Whites.
Anti-racism is just a code word for Anti-White.
Hat Tip: an anonymous contributor.
Sunday, December 11, 2011
Not only does Yancy Gates suckerpunch the only white player on the basketball court, Xavier's Kenny Frease, but his teammate Cheikh Moodj STOMPS on him (at :26, player number 13 in the upper right of the frame) after he already fell to the floor.
This angle isn't too revealing, unfortunately. Other clips show that Moodj explicitly targeted and attacked Frease with a flying foot stomp after he was down.
It was obvious from the clip that Frease wasn't throwing punches at the time, and even looked like he was trying to calm the situation, with his arms out, unmoving.
The attack itself, though seemingly Anti-White in that it coincidentally targeted the only white guy, wouldn't normally get featured here on Anti-Whitemedia.com. We expect such behavior, really, from these "athlete" thugs who have a woefully inflated sense of themselves. If you want an archive of black-on-white crime, go to thugreport.com or one of the many other sites that report on such things.
We feature this story here because the media smokescreen on this incident has totally obscured the racial angle.
If this had been a hockey game, and the lone black player had been specifically targeted for a brutal attack by the crowd of white guys, it would have made the national news. The players would have been hit with a hate crime. They would have gone to jail.
But not once on ANY news outlet reporting on this fight did any "journalist" have the courage to investigate what most people already know, that Frease was dropped to da flo because he was a honky and shiiit.
As with the media's failure to report the black-on-white criminality of "flash mobs," its refusal to report the "hate crimes" of blacks in this brawl shows a sickening Anti-White bias which is particularly dangerous because it only encourages the perps.
UPDATE: Speaking of encouraging the perps: instead of getting tossed out of school and going to jail, Yates has received a paltry 6-game suspension from his team. Yawn.
Boycott: U. Cincinatti
Thursday, December 8, 2011
It never ceases to amaze me what passes for "entertainment" these days, what some people will spend hours of the only life they will ever live prostrated in front of, slouched on their couches.
Some critics of this site accuse its supporters of being little more than out-of-touch, afraid, aging white men who just can't handle the idea of a black guy paired up with white women (or at least Indo-European women in the case of Armenians).
But it isn't about not being able to handle anything. To me, seeing a naked black guy or even a naked Eskimo is no more interesting than seeing a naked water buffalo. They are simply representatives of the animal kingdom. Speaking of Eskimos: I want to know this: why don't we see season premiers of big reality TV shows that feature naked Eskimos?
Doesn't it seem odd that the same liberal whites and jews who obsess so much about "equality" and fair and evenly distributed representation will never give us a show that features a naked Eskimo yoga instructor teaching a room full of Pakistani hermaphrodites? No. It will always be a black guy mixed with some white women. "There must be some way," the producers will think, "that we can contrive for a naked black guy to be in the same room with some nearly nude white women with their white asses in the air. That would have 'season premier' written all over it!"
Ask yourself: why is this being produced? There is an agenda here beyond "entertainment." It is simply par for the course of a culture that is obsessed with promoting the plight of blacks and the point of view of blacks and the private parts of blacks. And all I can say in response is I don't care about any of that. I want my culture back. I want a white western culture to be free of this mental yoke, this mind-forged manacle of racial guilt and fear politics and in yo face sex friction. I want my children to be able to switch on the television without being barked at visually, without being grappled into some kind of racial submission, without being reminded that there is an impending genocide targeting them, with over-the-top spectacles and billions of corporate dollars backing it all up.
But if I complain about shows like this I am called a racist.
Ah. Methinks the people who are against my supposed racism are really only against my explicit whiteness.
Hat tip: an anonymous contributor.
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
Thursday, December 1, 2011
If there is any possible way for three beautiful, young, nubile Caucasian girls to come into contact with a black guy in a commercial, you know our current crop of Anti-White Media advertisers will find that way, will contrive to get us there by the seventh second of their ad. Think it's an accident?
Subconsciously, couch potatoes everywhere will then perk up their interest. Our species, as many in the animal kingdom, must compete for females. So the fear of losing these ladies to the black guy makes us anticipate what will happen next.
Magically, these white girls evoke "the most perfect white guy imaginable." They construct their ideal: handsome, smart, tall, strong, chiseled, sensitive, mysterious.
But apparently even the best white man that can possibly be imagined is no match for the nonchalant black guy, who chides the white guy, commanding him to get off the car as a parent would command a child.
The message: even the best white guy you could ever imagine, ladies, is no match for your average black guy, who will shame him publicly.
Boycott: State Farm