White Women: Competing For Black Rod

This show depicts whites as dumb on all levels. The white guest seems borderline retarded, but even she feels like white men are beneath her intellectually and generally beneath contempt.

Then black women, who also seem borderline retarded, try to edu-mackate dis white ho 'bout how dere black brothaz be usin' dem and sheet caws deys so stooopid.

Is it any surprise that Ricki Lake is of The Tribe? Must they always be so obvious in promoting their vile Anti-White agenda?

More bad news: if you think this poisonous show is off the air, think again. They're bringing it back.

Stupid White Boys/Righteous Black Father

Often, as we have repeatedly shown, Anti-White Media depicts a kind of Bizarro World reality in which all the negative stereotypes associated with blacks are inverted. In movies such as Source Code or Unstoppable or Green Mile or Far From Heaven (the list goes on and on) - blacks are genius physicists or genius mystics or generally misunderstood genius geniuses. They are always ALWAYS contrasted with stupid, misguided morally corrupt whites.

This commercial is no different. It inverts the statistically provable trend of the absentee father in the black community by presenting us with a protective, present, conscientious, alert, and nurturing black father figure. But he cannot just be an active principle of goodness alone. No. He must be juxtaposed with some degraded white kids. What incompetent Caucasian parental unit has let their kids run feral?

The black guy looks at the white kids with a kind of strange self-righteousness in his eye that says "Hell no is my kids gonna end up like these crazy ass white boys, throwin' theys money around."

And Montreal-based BMO Harris Bank thinks this ad is going to endear whites to them?

Perhaps their marketing strategies and PR marching orders simply come to them from on high, directly from Rothschildlandia.

Pure speculation there. But it wouldn't surprise me.

Hat tip: Anonymous & Artur @ crimesofthetimes.com

Selling Interracial Sex

To the uninformed, this public service announcement might seem to be just stating the fact that when we have our eyes closed we can't tell what color people's skin is.

It is true, after all, that most creatures in the animal kingdom use their eyes to see color.

But this ad goes further. It is explicitly selling interracial sex.

And, even more explicitly, it is promoting sex between a black guy and a white girl.

The black guy at :01 is paired with the white girl at :04. This is a technique called bookending: even though a few other faces flit on the screen between them, the white girl and black guy share the first scraps of dialogue. THEY are having the conversation. It doesn't matter that other races then join in on that conversation; the conversation was initiated between the black guy at :01 and the white girl at :04, and the fact that it was a black guy and a white girl was no accident of casting or editing.

Notice there are no prepubescent kids in this ad. This is because it is rife with sexualized innuendo: the final line of the white girl at :24, saying "when we turn out the lights," is essentially an invitation to come to bed. Note too it is implied that her bed partner will not be white, because then the game doesn't work: if she turns out the lights to have sex with a white guy, no longer does the lack of light erase the differences between the two bedmates - indeed, there would be no difference to erase.

The ad sets up a game that can only be played by finding a bedmate of a different skin tone and then turning out the lights in order to abolish that difference. That is the game. Now play it you raceless zombies.

Follow the money: this ad is put out by the Art Institutes, a division of the federally subsidized (there's those tax dollars at work again) Education Management Corporation (EDMC).

41 percent of EDMC is owned by Goldman Sachs.

Why on earth would Goldman Sachs promote interracial breeding?

Your White Skin Is Hideous And Your Soul Is Corrupt

Just a friendly reminder from the United Nations.

Xerox: Serve Dah Black Man, Whitey

Some might claim that this is just an inversion of the old "shoe shine boy" stereotype. You know: "Now it is duh white man who is shinein' dem shoes. Now it is duh white man who is duh caddy fo duh black man."

This could be chalked up to parody if it weren't for the fact that it is now the 21st century. In THIS century, white servitude to the top-dog black man is the status quo. At least that is how things are relentlessly promoted in the media. The Anti-Whites are selling this imagery for a reason.

The image at :13 speaks volumes. It shows not just an inversion of the past, where the master is now the slave and vice versa. It also disseminates the iconography of a new religious system that is as colonialist/expansionist as was sixteenth century Catholicism in South America--without simultaneously spreading, as the Spanish did, technical know-how and literacy.

When a race is being genocided, I guess it helps to show them as servile, subordinate, slavish.

We don't want the white man to get too uppity.

Boycott: Xerox.

Two More Examples Of How Anti-Racism Is A Code Word For Anti-White

Big Jew Bill Maher thinks he is being Anti-Racist by suggesting Hispanics, and minorities generally, get "screwed over by Caucasians" (:02).

But why Caucasians in particular, Bill? Funny, I know some Jews who own high-interest "payday" loan centers. They operate in south Texas and "screw over" Hispanics all the time. Why not rip on those guys, Bill? Why not make jokes about how your tribe has "screwed over" the Palestinians? No? Not gonna go there? I see how it is. I guess your Anti-Racism is just a code word for Anti-White.

Maher's guest Touré --yes, that's a one word name, like Prince or Sade or Seal--also evokes an evil "racism" that whites are only ever guilty of, even when there is no empirical evidence to support that claim of guilt. Racism here is like a "Fog" that scuds in imperceptibly at the whim of black people, to justify any claim whatsoever they might make.

This ability of blacks and only blacks to make an unsupported claim of racism is about as convenient an exercise of arbitrary intellectual totalitarianism as was the concept of predestination for the Calvinists. If you have black skin, or orange-ish skin as in the case of Touré, you are predestined to wield this mystical weapon of "racism" against those white folk who are predestined to be eternally damned with the taint of supreme corruption, (i.e., of being "racist")

Touré is a male version of Melissa Harris-Perry, whom we have recently featured and whom Touré himself here references. They are both professional Anti-White victim-pimping race hustlers. They have made a career in mainstream culture by giving their Anti-White comrades precisely what they want to hear: it doesn't matter if their spoutings are incoherent; their message is Anti-White, and thus major networks will prop them up with airtime and large audiences.

Touré: Racism is like "Fog": I can't grab it and show it to you, but whitey sure is guilty of it!

P.S. A tangential point:
At :15 Touré says "...and sociologists talk about that."
Isn't his logic infuriating?: i.e. if "sociologists" talk about it, it MUST be true!

Smokey Bear Be Settin' YT Straight

Anti-White Media Checklist

1. Femmy white nerd. (:13) Check.
2. White guy is immoral. (Burning leaves, leaving them unattended!) Check.
3. Black guy has magic powers. (The ability to transform into Smokey Bear). Check.
4. Black guy distributes wisdom and promotes social cohesion. ("You coulda torched the whole neighborhood.") (:18) Check.
5. Black guy is godlike. (He looks into your private home, your own private affairs and holds you up for judgement and scrutiny.) Check.
6. A not-so-subtle threat of violence. (Brown bear with massive muscles shows up at the door of white wimp.) Check.
7. Black guy is "smooth" with "hip" lingo ("Buzz whassup man! You lef some leaves burnin' out heah!") (:11) while the white guy is stuttering and inarticulate ("Yeah I- I- just- that- there was a- I- I- just came in just for a second") (:14). Check.
8. Black narrator gives more sage advice. (:23) Check.
9. Eerie "spy on your neighbors" Stalinist/Stasi/Social Marxist bullshit. Check.
10. Uses "humor" while suggesting blacks are cool and whites are idiots. Check.
11. Government funded. Check.

Hat tip: an anonymous contributor.

MSNBC: Encouraging Blacks To Contribute To Society Is So Rayyycisss

The Anti-White Media often weaponizes really lame semantic arguments, mere language claims and games.

They're only effective if you aren't paying attention.

When (Israel-Firster and uber-neocon) Michelle Bachmann makes the point that 47 percent of American adults pay no income tax, neither Melissa Harris-Perry nor Chris Hayes gainsay her. They can't deny the fact, so their response is that the language by which the fact is asserted is somehow itself corrupt. Hays, for instance, claims such language plays into the "old" (read: outdated) notions of "producerism" (nice: make it an ism and people will think the point is somehow invalid).

Harris-Perry cannot deny the fact either, so what does she do? She cries "Racism!"

How original!

And of course we know, since anti-racism is just a code word for anti-white, the upshot of her argument will be: don't complain, whitey; just keep paying those taxes that support a system that disenfranchises you!

Somehow someone has installed black anti-whites like Harris-Perry into positions in the media and academia where they can declaim the rules of language and spout off-the-cuff cryptologic. Their arguments are never compelling or convincing, but the mere fact that no one calls them on their idiocy leaves their ideas circulating in our culture, wielding undue but insidious influence.

Consider Harris-Perry's unintelligible diatribe between :46 and 1:17:

"...I just think that's racism. Yeah. I-I just, I just think it's 2011 version of the welfare queen...and, um, it-it-it's just a way of saying and and and not racism like a calling somebody a name but wh- that that what that is meant to imply, what [Bachmann's point is] meant to um suggest is that there is this whole group that is dependent and the fact is since we developed this language that the dependent groups are these 'illegal immigrants' and these unworking, unmarried poor black women who are welfare queens and and these criminal types I mean it's it's just a way of evoking all of these scary, racialized and poor others in a way that that allows us to separate this notion of hard-working, taxpaying Americans from, for example, 'refugees.'"

Then she smiles a self-satisfied smile at 1:17-1:18 as if she imagines she has just enlightened us with witty repartee.

The key phrase here is "since we developed this language." In her world, points and facts are only asserted if you are black. If you are white, a point is made in a "language" that "develops" out of your innate rayyycist evil and corrupt soul.

The idea of "developing" a "language" evokes images of a Bunsen-burner-strewn lab in which an evil mad scientist cackles to his assistant: "I've just about done it, Igor. I've developed a language that will allow us to make our racist points and yet cleverly disguise them in statistics about taxes...or to make points about taxes and couch them in spooky terms like 'other' and 'alien' and 'Welfare Queen' which will scare people into taking our side. "

But little did this mad scientist know that there would be an even greater genius out there named Melissa Harris-Perry who would be able to see through this disguise of language and call the rayyycisst out for being so rayyycissss!

But, seriously. Harris-Perry wants to imagine that the generalizing tendencies and biases of language only work one way, for whites against blacks. She will never admit that blacks' language--HER language--is fraught with the same biases. For example, she calls white complainers about the tax code rayyyciss and then implies that she is righteously anti-racist. But in reality she has only developed a language that allows her to claim a surface-assertion of "anti-racism" when ultimately she is really just asserting an agenda that is anti-white.


More of Harris-Perry's Anti-White logorrhea disguised as academic reasonableness can be found in an article she recently wrote for The Nation HERE. (I like how she forces the use of "epistemology" in this article's title, even though it isn't really appropriate. She's just trying to impress you with a word she learned in college to make you think that what she is saying is credible. Don't worry: it isn't.)

If you bother to read the article, notice how she uses the term "disparate impact" in the case of laws that, for instance, discriminate against blacks moving into a white neighborhood. Ask yourself: does Harris-Perry EVER consider the disparate impact of legislation on whites? Take Affirmative Action, for example. Doesn't AA have a disparate impact on whites, forcing them to score higher on admissions tests in order to get the same positions given to lower-scoring blacks?

Once again, Harris-Perry thinks she is being anti-racist.

Anti-racism is just a code word for anti-white.

E Pluribus Unum

Two different reality series, one common theme:






Meet the new holy icons in the new Anti-White religion of blackworship, to be broadcast regularly all over our Miscege-Nation. Check tv listings for times of worship.

EXTRA! EXTRA!

UPDATE:

I'm sure opinions vary widely about P.J.B, but it appears he has just aided our cause, helping to launch the issue of white genocide into the mainstream with his NEW BOOK. (See the blurb for chapters 4 through 9.)

I wonder what the Bob Whitakers and Horus The Avengers of the world think about this? I can't help but find myself pleased.

Discuss.