Goodbye Blue Sky

A bit of a departure, I know. But I found this to be a more moving, thought-provoking commentary on our pernicious Anti-White Media than anything I could post today.

P.S. RAMZPAUL uses "youths" as a tongue-in-cheek pseudonym for blacks.

CNN Is Anti Tea Party Because They Are Anti White

Politics aside, CNN's hostile interview of Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky) reeks of pure, unfiltered Anti-White fervor.

Is it because the anchor Don Lemon must emphasize the fact that Rand Paul is a "freshman" senator? A bit of a jab, but no. Is it because he speaks to him condescendingly throughout the interview? Not necessarily. Is it because he disrespectfully interrupts him in order to accuse him of being disrespectful? Is it because he uses talking points to chastise him for using talking points?

No and no. CNN is NOT Anti-White simply because it features this black guy putting the rhetorical screws to a white guy (ineffectively, I might add). Those are the optics on the surface level, but CNN's Anti-White streak goes far deeper.

To understand the relentless Anti-White stance of CNN, you have to go back at least a year, back before the Tea Party rose to gain significant power in the US Congress.


Last July, a different cast of black CNN talking heads could only disparage the movement for being "raayciss." But where was this racism?

They could only point to a bunch of (what to them were) "mean-spirited" signs at Tea Party rallies. But of course the US has a long history of venomous name-calling on all sides of any given political debate.

Don't fool yourself. The only reason CNN condemned the Tea Party last year and the reason they condemn the Tea Party today is because for them the movement represents white people, white self-interest.

For fifty years the CNNs of the world have made white advocacy a big no-no. You are not supposed to explicitly stand up for white interests or "speak on behalf of white people."

Whether or not you agree with its politics, and indeed whether or not you believe it advances white interests, the Tea Party is a movement composed almost entirely of white people. And on an Anti-White station like CNN, a movement of white people will inevitably be compared with naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews (second video, 4:37).

They claim they are anti-racist. What they are is Anti-White. Anti-racism is just a code word for Anti-White.

But I Can't Relate...

I'm supposed to feel safe when a half-Mex / half-Asian uber-masculine mystery meatress is "protecting" a disunified, heterogeneous group of people with no common ethnic background against enemies that will necessarily be non-White. Can you run that by me again? Isn't this exactly what happened to Rome?

Those Notorious Brinks Commercials

I've heard commentary on these, from the perspective of your average Republican, beer-sipping, football-watching, Negro-worshipping Amerikwan male, stating that these adverts are hostile to men. Are you kidding me? You don't notice something more vile? For example:

1)

Those young mystery-meat children are just enjoying their television with their White/Latina mother when, BOOM, in crashes a Bulgarian skinhead, intent on playing Bootface with the miscegenator and her spawn. Because this situation is fairly common in the Disjewnited States of Amerikwa.

More Talmudvision Boohickey

What's more egregious, the "White" or the overemphasis on this fellows pronounced ethnic Whiteness, as embodied by his striking blue eyes and fair skin? Because, as is common knowledge in this upside-down world of overt Satanism and immorality, blue eyed White men are the most perpetuated and common criminals, as manifested in the innumerable Brinks commercials that show similar acts of crime, i.e., burglaries. Which reminds me... time for another post.

I know none of you Whites are going to be watching television anyways, since you are already aware of Das Juden, right? Right?!

Dear White America:

For embracing your own genocide (re: diversity) without a whimper.

-Signed, The Jews in Charge

Learning the Signs, Part I

Perhaps I'm just being very paranoid, but for the purpose of the initial stages of this website, I'm going to point out how a combination of different images can contribute to impounding specific ideas into the head of the unwary viewer. This may or may not be cooperatively intentional on behalf of the individual producers of the individual pieces of media that appear in tandem to assault the reader, but may in fact be unwitting. However, the presentation of a multicultural array of images created by many people that most likely do not have pro-White agendas, can engender a subtle but very powerful effect.

Here is your average page from CNN, arguably a liberal news network that makes no ends to hide stories that may be detrimental to multicultural propagandizing. However, this array was likely unintended, though I'm willing to accept arguments to the otherwise. On the left one sees a White male purchasing fast food from another White male.

Any visitor to a large number of fast food restaurants in urban areas in the majority of this country is aware that the most frequent customers to these establishments are non-Whites, oftentimes obese. However, on the right side of the page, we see three images, two of which feature very muscular and fit Black men, juxtaposed next to a dozing and undefined White or Whitish male. The words "snoring" and "death" are associated with the White male, whereas "muscle" and "development" are assigned to the Black male.

Very sneaky, indeed.