Di[e]versity Training Video - Training You How To Hate Whitey

[Pardon for the recent lull. Holidays, you know.]

Today we feature a form of Anti-White Media that we have heretofore neglected: the diversity training video.

Many of us have been forced to watch them when taking a new job. Has anyone ever noticed how over-the-top Anti-White they are?

What this video doesn't tell you, but which is clear from the production company's website, is that the non-whites it features are for the most part professional "diversity" consultants.

The most hostile man here, the colorfully dressed, mixed-race guy, Mr. Victor Lewis, has made a living airing Anti-White grievances. Therefore his spiel about the white guy "standing on the shoulders" of other races is likely scripted; it is probably a point he has made (and was likely paid to make) in front of audiences hundreds of times.

Meanwhile, the white guy they gang up on is just your average Joe. He's not a professional advocate for white interests. He just runs a shop.

So here we have professional race hustlers and "diversity trainers" picking on this one white fall-guy. They put him on trial. Even the black guy he's sitting next to, who acts as his lawyer, turns on him.

But if I had been in the room, I would have had to remind them that just about every race there had at one time gone through an expansionist phase. For instance, one of the men next to Mr. Lewis looks like he could be a Mongolian. Why doesn't Mr. Lewis turn threateningly towards the Mongolian man and tell how he "stood on the shoulders of," enslaved, dominated and decimated the white people of the Russian Steppe for hundreds of years? If the man happened to be Japanese, Mr. Lewis could have complained how the man's ancestors enslaved the Koreans for thousands of years.

In fact, Mr. Lewis himself looks vaguely like Muammar Gaddafi. He could easily be part Arab or Moor. But he doesn't turn to himself and say: You know, self, for hundreds of years you harassed all your neighbors; you killed and enslaved the Indo-European Persians; you converted them at the point of a sword to your oppressive religion; you conquered and killed and converted the people of Spain; you harried all weaker and less organized tribes, enslaved them when you could and justified that enslavement with your not-very-PC religious text, the Koran. Indeed, you have historically dominated your own women, who to this day are far less likely than a white European woman to maintain any sense of independence.

I could go on with critiques of Mr. Lewis, and shall: he singles out the white guy for such particular scorn, blaming him for the alleged wrongs of the white race as a whole. But, to be fair, does he ever think to thank him for the things that the white race has done for him? Has given him? The clothes he is wearing, as Afro-licious as they appear, were made in a textile mill invented by white people. Books, in which he studied to learn how to hate white people, were invented by white people. He probably drove to the film set in a car, invented by white people. And the camera that was used to spread his message of hating white people was invented by white people.

He cries and moans about how North America was taken from red people by white people. But why, then, is he in North America? Who is keeping him here? It's the 21st century, Mr. Lewis. You can get on a plane (invented by white people) and move back to the Sudan, where you look to be from. Oh, but then how would you earn your bread, Mr. Lewis? For then in the Sudan, who would pay you to complain about white people?

Don't mean to burst your bubble, Mr. Lewis, but there in the Sudan you would find people who look a lot like you, people who are currently in the process of raping and murdering and marauding their weaker, darker neighbors. Not a single victim-pimping race-hustling seminar within a thousand miles! How on earth would you then manage to pump yourself up with your high-and-mighty speechifying? How on earth would you continue to spin the narrative of your moral superiority?

I mean, there are lots and lots of ways to counter Mr. Lewis' impassioned argument that aren't, as he claims, merely efforts to "mystify" this issue. If anything, Mr. Lewis is the one doing the mystifying. His raised voice, threatening posture, and harsh tone all serve to take the discussion out of the realm of facts and logic, and push it into the realm of coercion, which is precisely where the makers of this film want to take it.

One more thing: this idea that blacks are somehow morally righteous because they never were imperialistic or colonialist is pure hogwash on so many levels. For one, don't all the PC history texts talk about how we all come from Africa? So if people who are descended from Africans live all over the world, doesn't that mean that at some point Africans were expansionist, and displaced the other human species? Seems kinda contradictory that we are constantly encouraged to celebrate the fact that "we're all from Africa" but fail to heap upon those expansionist Africans the same scorn we reserve for those expansionist Europeans.

Furthermore, the fact that Africans failed to expand like Europeans did in modern times has nothing to do with some kind of innate virtue among blacks. I mean, it wasn't like blacks thought of taking North America for themselves and then chose not to because like peace-loving little Dalai Lamas they thought it would be "disrespectful" to take the lands of other tribes. No. Everybody knows they didn't expand on their own because they couldn't get their act together, technologically speaking. If they could have, you know they would have. Had they been able to construct the Viking longship, they would have made it to Nova Scotia, too. This bitching and moaning about white colonialism is just displaced envy.

This video, claiming to be about encouraging "diversity," actually only trains us how to hate white people.

Blacks In Training For Fatherhood After Impregnating White Women

Uh...Maybe you have to be Italian to fully get this one.

All I need to know about it is that it causes a gag reflex. It is perhaps even worse than THIS one, which we featured here a few years back.

How far the Italians have fallen from the old days of Marcus Aurelius, Leonardo, Galileo... Cato...

Hat tip to an anonymous commenter/contributor.

In Spartacus (1960): An Early Example Of Blackworship

The "big black one" is the "most beautiful," says the white woman.

Would you see a quote like this in any films of the 1930s or 40s?

This brief scene might seem innocuous by today's Anti-White Media standards. But the portrayal of these amoral whites, juxtaposed with the noble, powerful black guy, is an early sign of things to come, preceding Flame in the Streets (1961) by a year.

Thus from an archivist's standpoint I wanted to get Kubrick's "classic" logged here.

Gerber: Meek Dumb Whites Get Schooled By With-it Blacks

Look at the framing job at :01. Not only did they cast a middle-aged, chubby white guy, but they just had to wedge him between darkened silhouettes. They could have shown him surrounded by happy, friendly faces, but instead they chose to put him amid a hazy sea of obscurity. The effect is not very flattering.

While he looks so adrift, he asks, tentatively, about the uncertain future.

Contrast this with the black guy at :06. He is surrounded by attractive women, and he and his wife are the stable, giving, bestowers of sage advice.

The white guy is so expendable, he doesn't even appear again in the commercial. You only see his supposed wife who sides with the black advice, urging her witless husband off-screen that they need to get hip to the program ASAP.



Another version of the Gerber commercial excises the white male altogether. The effect: three women, two of them white, having a coffee-talk with a wise black guy. Maybe the white guy is hidden behind the glass cylinder thing at :03, but you don't really know for sure, do you?

Hat tip to an anonymous commentor.

Boycott: Gerber.

Whites Have To Vote For Blacks TWICE, Or They Be Rayycisss

During the 2008 US presidential election, accusations of "racism" were often made against anyone who didn't support Obama. At the time, I knew that this tactic would succeed: Americans like to think of themselves as "moral" and "fair" and "righteous;" they're deathly afraid of not living up to "egalitarian principles."

Of course thinking individuals knew that imbedded in this media push for "fairness," for letting the black guy be president for once, was an insidious unfairness: Obama was treated with unfair deference by the Big Media who wouldn't vet him as they normally would for fear of being labelled "raaayyyycisss." They rarely asked him tough questions in interviews; they always showed him in the most positive light.

But most importantly, they corroborated with team Obama in spreading the whisper-campaign that "all who don't vote for Obama be rayyycisss."

The tactic worked so well I just knew we would see it dredged up again for the 2012 race. It's like a hit movie's bad sequel. In the video above, we see the trailer for the new blockbuster to come: in Obama II The Wrath Of Barack we find that one has to vote for the black guy TWICE in order to PROVE beyond a shadow of a DOUBT that they aren't rayyyycisss.

This clip from Matthews is beyond hilarious. Look how he is sure to call these black commentators "professors" from whom he is eager to get "analysis." But he only asks these "professors" for their "analysis" on how we can all more effectively blame whitey.

Matthews has the audacity to suggest that whites hold their black elected officials to a higher or more "rigorous standard." No Chris, it's the other way around. If Bush had done Solyndra, Lightsquared, Rezko, Attackwatch, the failed 2016 Olympic bid, the expansion of wars in the Middle East, the expansion of rendition, and at the same time presided over perpetual 9+% unemployment, the Big Media would have annihilated him.

In contrast, they are perpetual spinmeisters on Obama's behalf. "Obama is not to blame that he has failed so badly that nobody wants to vote for him next year. It's only ever whitey's fault. They be rayyyyycisss."

CNN engages in the same tactic below.



Look how Piers Morgan sets up Morgan Freeman's Anti-White rant by asking him if the election of Obama has made rayyyycism worse. Of course Freeman takes the idea and runs with it. (I am surprised how unintelligent he seems, here without a script to emote from...Reminds me of a particular "articulate" president).

Whitey got guilted into voting for an open-borders communist Soros-stooge in 2008. But as far as Freeman is concerned that still isn't sufficient to expunge the evil sin that flows through whitey's veins. It never will be.

Don't think that this is an appeal for people to vote "Republican." It isn't necessarily that. It is just to show how, in the 21st century's Anti-White Media, whites who dare reject the new religion of Blackworship (or Soros' Open Borders, or Multiculturalism, or Holocaustianity) are immediately inscribed into a sinister new demonology.

Slacking White Feminerds Draw The Ire Of Hard-Working Black Lesbian

More Anti-White propaganda from the GEICO Bizarro World.

After years of Affirmative Action's shoehorning blacks into jobs for which they aren't, technically speaking, qualified, we now enter a weird phase in which our elites try to convince us that blacks actually run things and that without their wise, righteous, hardworking presence, the world and workplace would soon devolve into white-male sissidom and non-productive chaos.

Hat tip: Anonymous Commenter.

White Guy Ruins The Day Of Cool Black Protagonist, Sagacious Black Man Has The Answers

"Are you in good hands?" Asks Dennis Haysbert, Allstate's Magic Spokesnegro.

This video depicts a cool black guy, cruising down the road in his flashy new ride. All is well until da white man crashes into him.

Two cool, successful, reliable blacks in one 30-second commercial, whereas the only white guy is "he who will crash into your car and ruin your day."

Castle Lager: Whitey Will Eventually Get Sad And Realize He Should Racially Blend

More Anti-White propaganda from South Africa. The "message" of this ad is unmistakable: whites who try to maintain their own territory are doomed to fail; they will inevitably racially blend.

At first these three all-white cricket fans are having a good time, revelling in their splendid isolation from the rest of humanity. They have abundant space, abundant food, and they have each-other.

But not only are they all white, they're all male. The fact that these three whites have no females among them subliminally suggests that they will not be able to reproduce, that their segregated society is unsustainable, doomed.

Look how the multiculturalists not only have Castle Lager to lubricate their multifarious fun, leaving the three whites feeling lonely and left-out, they also have some big-boobed blonde girls who are dangled in front of our minds as the "prize" for joining them (:57).

But what this ad doesn't tell you is this: that there are 50+ countries in Africa that are run by blacks, some at the explicit exclusion of whites. No one is making beer commercials that feature blacks who try and fail to segregate themselves from the rest of humanity. Only whites are made to feel guilty whenever they try to engage in this perfectly natural and human practice of ingroup association.

Castle Lager is Anti-White.

Boycott Castle Lager.

Castle Lite: Servile Whitey Can't Touch Dis, Only Blacks Can

A contributor turned us on to an Anti-White brand out of South Africa, Castle Lager.

This beer company promotes the White Genocide in South Africa by repeatedly showing negative images of whites and repeatedly deriding and deconstructing any semblance of white racial loyalty or pride.

Here, as in many of their ads, the black man is romanticised and lauded at whitey's expense. The whitey is weak, servile, and can't even touch a chilled bottle without disintegrating into a pathetic, panicky, freak. Only blacks are cool enough to hold the phallic object of desire.



In Castle ads, blacks are paid tribute. Their struggles are "cool." How can this corporation celebrate the Soweto uprisings (in the ad above) without implying that that limp whitey (in the previous ad) belongs in his servile, subordinate role - in the nation he and his white forefathers built?

Castle Lager is Anti-White.

Boycott: Castle Lager, Castle Light.

Racial Smokescreen II: WUSA Promotes Black Excuses For Flash Mob

WUSA 9 is a sorry excuse for a news organization. Look how they repeatedly mention the novelty of an all-female flash mob, without once bothering to mention mentioning that the females are also all black.

Selectively reporting the facts, are we?

But that is just the beginning. As if it isn't enough to leave the viewing audience uninformed as to the identity of the shoplifters, they actually provide these criminals with excuses for their crimes.

WUSA 9 interviews blacks who (surprise!) justify the flash mobs (1:30, 1:41). These sorry excuses go completely unchallenged by the reporters. Thus it seems as if they, too, are promoting this angle.

So if there are any flash mob sistahs out there watching this, just keep on doin' whachoo doin'. According to WUSA 9, you have every right to stick it to dah man!

Grossly irresponsible, Anti-White journalism on every front.

If You See White Terrorists, Tell Black Authorities

If you see white terrorists, tell black authorities.

Courtesy of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, supported by dupedwhiteytaxdollars.

White Slave/ Black King

The so-called humor in this ad is based on the contrast between the opulence of the throne and the frumpiness of the pathetic white wage slave who is trying to look like he belongs on it. Silly mortal, golden thrones are intended for our black God-King.

Of course this video is reminiscent of the series of Terry Tate videos, where an enormous muscle-bound black athlete belittles pasty office cubicle sheep.

AWM Guarantee: You will never see Dirk Nowitzki in an ESPN commercial in which he can't find his golden throne, only to discover it has been stolen by an out-of-shape black guy.

BBC Racial Smokescreen: Blacks Are Reformers Not Rioters (Media Silence Is Anti-White, Volume III)

The BBC's main goal here is not to inform the populace about the dangers on their streets, but to obfuscate the real racial issue in this story.

Like most mainstream media, the BBC tried to conceal that the vast majority of the criminals participating in last weeks Tottenham riots were black.

Look how the BBC never shows close-ups of the rioters (1:31). The looters are only shadowy, hooded figures seen from a distance. They could be anyone. They could be your son, your brother, your sister. Just how the BBC wants it.

Meanwhile, they spend the second half of the video interviewing blacks close-up, good-guy blacks who take up the mantle of reform. Through the voices of the blacks they interview, who go unquestioned, unchallenged, the BBC blames the looting on "outsiders," "opportunists," "anarchists" from other neighborhoods, the local authorities' "lack of communication," the lack of jobs, or the lack of "youth projects."

They blame everything but the clear culprit: Black Mob Criminality.

Repeat the refrain: when the media ceases to disclose to whites precisely who or what endangers them, that media ceases to be useful and starts to be Anti-White.

Boycott: The BBC.

British Airways: White Guys Fly Alone; Black Guys Fly With Their Gorgeous White Wives

With their in-flight safety video, British Airways puts itself at the propagandizing spear-point in the fight for white genocide.

Imagine how many thousands of air travellers see this cartoon every day, all ages, all genders - all part of a captive audience: they are buckled up, literally strapped in, and forced to watch this not-so-subtle brainwashing material.

British Airways elite-sters know all about the mind's impressionability. Humans, like other primates, like to mimic the behavior they observe. Thus as much as British Airways folks think their video "represents" interracial mating patterns, it also encouragings and perpetuates those patterns: the white woman is here paired up with a black guy. They have a bi-racial child, who is literally the star of the show. People will think this is normal. And for the majority of the population, it is always desirable to be normal.

Meanwhile, thoughout the video, this fruitful, interracial union is contrasted with a white guy who is flying by himself, who is represented as pathetic, isolated, sterile in his solitude (1:47).

Will people wittingly change their mating patterns based on this video? Probably not. But the more these memes are reinforced, the more they take root in the subconscious of the young, where they are their most virulent. All you have to do is look around the streets of London to see the social changes that 50 years of such propaganda has elicited.

And, needless to say, no one is spreading this kind of propaganda in Vietnam, where a Vietnamese guy is flying by himself while a Vietnamese woman is flying and mating with a black guy.

No one is spreading this kind of propaganda in Mexico, where a Mexican guy is flying by himself while a Mexican woman is flying and mating with a black guy.

No one is spreading this kind of propaganda in Uganda, where a Ugandan guy is flying by himself while a Ugandan woman is flying and mating with a white guy.

No one is spreading this kind of propaganda in Japan, where a Japanese guy is flying by himself while a Japanese woman is flying and mating with a black guy.

No. This kind of social engineering propaganda is only created and disseminated in all white countries and only white countries.

Once again, it's Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, white countries for everybody.

Boycott: British Airways.

Media Silence Is Anti-White, Volume II

Continuing the theme of yesterday's post, today we meet Delroy Grant, Britain's most prolific rapist OF ALL TIME.

He was convicted four months ago, after nearly TWO DECADES of raping elderly people in South London.

Police estimate Grant raped about 500 to 600 people over those two decades.

Why did it take so long for the London police to catch this guy?

Perhaps it's because, though they KNEW he was black based on the descriptions that victim after victim gave, still they released a white "e-fit" wanted poster (1:36) in order to be Politically "Correct."

Why doesn't the BBC draw attention to this disparity? Why don't they mention that the criminal was black, while the police were asking people in the neighborhood to be on the look out for a white guy?

And why did it take a BNP Freedom of Information request to shed light on what the BBC and other media outlets refused to disclose, namely that Grant's 600 victims were white?

How many hundreds, how many thousands of people must be victimized as a result of the willful ignorance of the police and the BBC?

Repeat the refrain from yesterday: when the news media refuses to disclose to whites precisely who or what endangers them, that media ceases to be useful and starts to be Anti-White.

Why is the BBC so Anti-White?

Wisconsin "Teen" Mob: Media Silence Is Anti-White

When blacks break any number of innumerable "color barriers" - first black astronaut, first black congressman from district x, first black person to climb Mt. Whitney or swim the English Channel - it is automatically news!

Their blackness is what makes it news.

But when blacks break certain other things, apparently it isn't newsworthy at all.

...such as when they riot and break the windshield on your car, or your wife's nose, or your son's arm.

Or, if the story happens to make the news, nary a peep you will hear of "blackness."

When the news media refuses to disclose to whites precisely who or what endangers them, that media ceases to be useful and starts to be Anti-White.

Numinous Negro Powerfully Aligns Your Back; 'Racist' White Guy With Bad Teeth Yells At You

More Anti-White social engineering propaganda.

The underlying "message" of the banal 2008 snore Happy-Go-Lucky seems to be that white people are rayyyciss "haters" and that blacks are perfect, even "magic."

The main character Poppy even says as much of her hulking black chiropractor: "Magic fingers!" (2:38).

Her encounter with this doctor is highly sexualized, and is contrasted with a scene in which her roommate observes a pathetic fat white male patient (:38) just to more emphatically underscore Poppy's doctor's magic, healing blackness.

Moreover, while Poppy's black primary school students diligently try to study (2:45) they are viciously attacked by a little ginger-haired white boy (2:53). Commie social workers then trace the little whitey's violent streak to her mother's abusive boyfriend with the very white sounding name: Jason.

This violent evil emerging out of this white boy is subliminally threaded onto Poppy's white driving instructor, since she asks him if he, too, was abused at home. The old coot then screams at her about multiculturalism and how the Washington Monument is connected with the number 666.

The only positive white male figure is her "social worker" boyfriend who helps her snoop into the origin of the white boy's violent streak. The message: "The only acceptable white males are those who abet Anti-White multiculturalism. Meanwhile, blacks are flawless and magic. So don't, you know, oppose multiculturalism."

Also, we are supposed to be OK with the fact that in Poppy's London classroom whites are the minority. If we speak out against the white genocide, we're rayyyciss, just like her rotten-toothed driving instructor.

P.S. Why was I not surprised when I found that the director Mike Leigh OBE originally had the last name of Lieberman?

Afro-Hispanic (And Maybe Gay) Spider-Man Will "Reflect" The Racial Changes In America

Why would whites get bent out of shape over the new Afro-Hispanic Spider Man? He is, after all, a comic book character. And, hey, Marvel Comics announced the new teenaged black kid would reflect the "racial changes in America" and make the Marvel Universe more "diverse."

I suppose a similar rationale might underlie why the Norse god Heimdall was played by a black actor in the recent movie "Thor." After all, the population of many parts of Scandinavia is looking much darker now than it did in the 9th century.



Some media have been ruthless in their mockery of whites who complained about these casting/creative decisions.

But why is it always the white heroes and white gods and white icons that must fall before the sacred religion of multi-culturalism? What would the black community say if, for example, gay Latino icon Ricky Martin was cast in the lead role in a new film about the folk hero John Henry? Would the NAACP sit silent as their "steel drivin' man" underwent a "queering" in the name of "reflecting" demographic change?

Indeed, speaking of folk heroes, what if some forward-thinking director cast Gabourey Sidibe as Anne in the latest production of The Diary of Anne Frank? Would a certain tribe really mind so much, as long as it "reflected" the "racial changes" in modern Amsterdam?



Once again it's Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, WHITE ICONS for EVERYBODY!