Friday, May 27, 2011
Whitey, You Have No Freedom Of Association
This little nagging man, lets call him a professional nagger, criss-crosses the nation in search of white enclaves in order to harass, demean, and generally nag their inhabitants.
Why would whites want to segregate themselves from other races? he implicitly asks, implicitly calling them raaayyyciss for wanting to do so. It's not like crime rates plummet when whites create homogenous communities or anything.
Or maybe the rates do fall, but who would want that? Isn't it much more fun and, er, vibrant, when our communities are multi-ethnic, multi-racial, multi-multi-multi?
What Mr Benjamin fails to see, and will never see until he climbs down off his moral high horse, is that:
no one is going into the jungles of the Amazon and telling the natives there that they are wrong to want to be among their own kind and encouraging them to mix with other races;
no one is going to cities in Japan that are 98 percent Japanese and telling them that they are wrong to want to be among their own kind and encouraging them to mix with other races;
no one is going into Chad, into small ethnic enclaves of blacks, and telling them that they are wrong to want to be among their own kind and encouraging them to mix with other races;
no one is going into Chinatown in Los Angeles and telling the ethnic Chinese that they are wrong to want to be among their own kind and encouraging them to mix with other races;
no one is going into exclusively black neighborhoods in Detroit and telling them that they are wrong to want to be among their own kind and encouraging them to mix with other races.
No. Only white communities are guilted into being diverse.
Mr. Benjamin thinks he is being anti-racist by making this documentary. Instead, he is just being Anti-White.
ANTI-RACISM IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
PLEASE HELP BLACKS, BY TEACHING THEM ABOUT THEIR PSYCHOPATHOLOGY.
ReplyDeleteMr. Benjamin should do a documentary about the psychopathology of blacks: violence, robberies, killings, foul language, freeloading from whites, low IQ (as proven in the book, 'The Bell Curve') but high aggression, and animal-like cultural values and sexual promiscuity. They have sex like animals with many many partners and that is why a black man is 1400% more likely to have HIV than a white person, and also much more likely to have other sexually transmitted diseases like syphilis, gonnorrhea, etc. Their countries (eg. Africa) and even some cities in the US where they rule are rampant with violence, pornography, aggression, poverty, and foul language. White women who go around with blacks are obviously mentally ill.
It is not their fault. They are born with low IQ, high testosterone (that leads to all that aggression as above) and congential psychopathic personality disorder. For an excellent research report on this, see:
See:
http://www.amren.com/0207issue/0207issue.html
Blacks must help other blacks civilize instead of trying to teach whites to descend into the gutter of negrophilia.
lol if he was hanging on edge of cliff nagging for help and a white man helped him .idealy the white man would kick dirt in his face
ReplyDeletethose naggers.
ReplyDelete"no one is going into the jungles of the Amazon and telling the natives there that they are wrong to want to be among their own kind and encouraging them to mix with other races;"
ReplyDeleteBecause the Amazon natives didn't colonize anybody. I keep pointing this out, yet you keep reposting the same shit. Are you really this slow in the head, or do you just not care?
Colonization was a long time ago, asshole. And what about the Arabs that bought Ukrainians as slaves 500 years ago, huh?
DeleteWhy are you cherry picking incidents from hundreds of years ago to justify genocide? You're not advocating making Mongolians a minority in Mongolia, because Genghis Khan killed millions of people and wiped out entire civilizations. You only advocate this for white people. You're just anti-white.
ReplyDelete"Because the Amazon natives didn't colonize anybody"
ReplyDeleteMost of the immigrant invaders have ancestors who invaded, colonized and enslaved somebody at some point in their history. A lot of Hispanics will have ancestors who were with Aztec invasions which took back tens of thousands of war prisoners for human sacrifice.
"You're not advocating making Mongolians a minority in Mongolia, because Genghis Khan killed millions of people and wiped out entire civilizations."
ReplyDeleteI advocate that Mongolia accepts immigrants from any of the countries it formerly invaded. Happy now?
By the way, I don't see you advocating that America should be returned to the Native Americans. You obviously think ONLY whites should have a country to themselves. Racist.
"A lot of Hispanics will have ancestors who were with Aztec invasions which took back tens of thousands of war prisoners for human sacrifice."
Exactly, and they are now all consider themselves one group, no more distinction between invader and invaded, therefore the problem is solved. No one in Mexico today refers to himself as an "Aztec Mexican" and discriminates against "non-Aztec Mexicans"; they are all just Mexicans. This is they way it should be in America; no more "white Americans" discriminating against "non-white Americans"; just everyone self-identifying as Americans. This is how a country comes together and becomes one people. The only people slowing down this process are you lot.
"The only people slowing down this process are you lot."
ReplyDeleteJews are the most racist group.
Blacks are second.
Most of the rest are 3rd.
White people and some of the rest are 4th.
"Blacks are second."
ReplyDeleteHogwash. Most black people accept mulattos as black. Most white people do not accept mulattos as white. Who is more racist?
"Most of the rest are 3rd."
More hogwash. Hispanics accept others as Hispanics if they speak fluent Spanish, regardless of ethnicity. (There are Hispanics of all ethnic backgrounds.) Anglos do not accept others as Anglos even if they speak fluent English. Who is more racist?
And yes, there are (thankfully) plenty of non-racist white people. When I said "you lot", I was referring to fans of this blog, not to white people in general.
"Most black people accept mulattos as black."
ReplyDelete"Hispanics accept others as Hispanics"
Acceptance of which individual is or is not a member of the in-group isn't the key test. The key test of racism is the level of hostility towards out-groups.
Jews are the most racist group.
Blacks are second.
Most of the rest are 3rd.
White people and some of the rest are 4th.
"Acceptance of which individual is or is not a member of the in-group isn't the key test."
ReplyDeleteActually it is the best measurement, since a total non-racist accepts people of any racial background and a total racist uses the one-drop-rule, thus providing us two fixed limits between which we can sort the rest. But never mind, I will play along just for fun.
"The key test of racism is the level of hostility towards out-groups."
Black countries have not had non-black colonies; white countries have had non-white colonies. Who is more racist?
Black countries have never had segregation laws; white countries have. Who is more racist?
Black countries have never had a blacks-only immigration policy; white countries have had whites-only immigration policies. Who is more racist?
Blacks are more open to interracial dating than whites. Who is more racist?
"Actually it is the best measurement"
ReplyDeleteI think inter-ethnic crime is the best measurement.
White people want segregation laws because there's a larger percentage of racist black criminals. I'm not saying all, just more. If there were more racist whites then blacks would want to be segregated from them.
"I think inter-ethnic crime is the best measurement."
ReplyDeleteIn which case, see the point about colonies.
"White people want segregation laws because there's a larger percentage of racist black criminals."
Explain why segregation laws also applied to Asians, who are famous for being non-criminal.
"If there were more racist whites then blacks would want to be segregated from them."
No. Blacks only want segregation from racist whites, and integration with non-racist whites:
"I believe in the brotherhood of man, all men, but I don't believe in brotherhood with anybody who doesn't want brotherhood with me." - Malcolm X
It used to be legal for whites to lynch blacks, yet even then did blacks give up on whites as a whole? No, they believed that there were good white people as well as bad white people, and reached out to the former. This is what you should be doing - reaching out to good black people and integrating with them - instead of following racist blogs.
Racist opinion don't deserve to be expressed. It's about understanding each one's differences.
ReplyDelete