Mellow, cool, hip, white girls need a black guy at their side and a cup o' joe in their hands. Millions have been spent by companies plugging this meme. If you think the interracial pairing in the commercial is accidental, look below at this full page, full color ad on the back cover of the uber-woman's magazine Real Simple:
Boycott: Starbucks.
This ad works on subconscious and more explicit levels simultaneously. We begin at :04 with a woman using a bicycle pump to fill a little girl's floaty. The ad makers will dream up so many creative ways to mimic the act of sex. Is it any accident that this woman is basically bouncing up and down on a long pole with a big smile on her face? Think that's unintentional?
Hardly. And though this woman looks Cuban/Hispanic or something, from a distance, before we see a close up of her face, her skin tone makes her look like she could easily be a tanned Caucasian. And she just happens to be bouncing up and down on a long black rod. That's right: the rod of the bicycle pump just happens to be black.
Now, of course the naysayers will claim that we are nuts, that we are seeing miscegenation everywhere. But keep watching this ad to the end and then tell me this is intro scene is an accident.
After the first few scenes, we see a bunch of white women looking from side to side, as if they're hunting for something. We even have a post-menopausal woman hunting through nature with binoculars. What could she be searching for? The answer comes in the final scene, the culmination of the ad, which ties the whole thing together.
What has been insinuated since the beginning and sought after through the middle finally gets consummated in the end: a white woman finds her black buck and climbs some fire stairs to what looks like will be a hip upstairs loft. She has a naughty look in her eye, as if to say, I'm gonna fuck the shit out of this black guy.
They embrace and are framed as the camera pans out. The white woman finds her man. The End.
Boycott: JC Penny.
The white male patient is just meat to be humiliated.
The white male surgeon is unethical.
The black lady is the "brains of this operation." She calls out her co-worker on his unethical behavior. She's the judge of white male morality.
She knows everything. She's a brain surgeon. She also knows a more efficient way for whitey to plan his vay-cay.
Note the weak-armed whitey hi-five. Note the disapproving black lady gaze.
Thus we have yet another ad in which blacks fill the role of the Big Other. The Lacanian Big Other, simply put, is the person or thing before whom one must keep up appearances, before whom one must be on good behavior. The Big Other can be a state or a parent. Here, as well as in a thousand other Anti-White ads, the Big Other is the black gaze. Why must the New World Order social engineers constantly promote blacks as this Big Other, and show whites, especially white males, as kowtowing to their afro-centric worldview?
Boycott: Kayak.
White man. The hockey stick is to emphasize that he's white. Of course he gets humiliated, stripped. His posture is wilty. His voice is meek. He gets transformed into an inanimate object which then gets destroyed. The black guy is given god-like powers. The ad is "funny" so we associate laughter and good times with white men getting smashed.
Par for the course. Now go buy your Old Spice, you self-loathing white sheep.
This one goes quickly, so you have to watch closely. But the message is clear: white males are the disposable, queer, rightful-recipients of violence and shame. Black males are the rightful recipients of porno messages from white women.
This commercial has an arc, a structure. I can block it out for you. It goes something like this: Naked White Woman [Random White Male Carnage] Cool Black Guy.
We see a duckfaced naked sudsy slut sending her photo through some Motorola messaging service or apparatus. The next few scenes trace the trajectory of the message: first she lights up the wires of a phone line, as if her message was still being sent the old fashioned way and was too hot for the old network to handle. The white phone company employee is not the intended recipient of the message. He's just gawking as it passes by him; in fact as a telecommunications lackey he is only there to facilitate its passing, and he is slacking on the job, drooling over an image not for him.
We are supposed to imagine the image moves on through the sequence of scenes. At each stage, white males are humiliated, infantilized, and bitch-slapped. The at :17 the poor white boy Jimmy behind the bathroom door is implicitly masturbating to the slutty pic. Then in quick succession three white men get slapped, two of whom are homos and all of whom are ugly.
It is no accident that the "cool black guy" (who in no way gets slapped, humiliated, or depicted as gay) stands below what looks to be a line dangling from above. He is, visually, the end of the line, i.e. the phone line that the white phone technician was working on. So the white woman at the beginning and the black guy at the end are bookends. He is the terminus of her slutty text.
What do you think the odds were that this interracial pairing was intended from the beginning, at the inception of this ad? I can see it now: ad agency assholes sitting in their sewing circles, trying to concoct a way for a naked white woman to be paired with a cool black guy's gaze.
Such is often the goal in our genocidal 21st century western visual culture.
[Update: Still working on my book related to this blog. Thanks for your patience while the posts are few-and-far-between for the next several months. I do hope to post a few more this month, however.]
Two different reality series, one common theme:Meet the new holy icons in the new Anti-White religion of blackworship, to be broadcast regularly all over our Miscege-Nation. Check tv listings for times of worship.
Klohe Kardashian is slutted up in her miniskirt, flirting with her hubbie, Lamar Odom.
They're about to have sex, you know, since when they share their pistachios, they "do it as foreplay."
This sets up multivalent sexual innuendo: first, we have the "busting nut" at the end of the commercial. To bust a nut, as many of you may know, is a euphemism for male ejaculation.
As if this isn't vile enough, the visuals combine to suggest genitalia in the act of miscegenation. The slit in the cloven pistachio nut is the white female vulva that gets destroyed by the big black rod, the bag of pistachios.
Accidental? Oh sure.
I can't believe they would have a commercial for something as lowly as pistachio nuts in the first place. It's kinda like advertising air, water, or seashells. But to take something as innocuous as pistachio nuts and turn it into a full-throttle miscegenation propaganda weapon sure takes chutzpah.
Hat tip to an anonymous commenter.
Boycott: Wonderful Pistachios.
The usual Anti-White eye poison from Coca-Cola Company, makers of Vitaminwater.
Carrie Underwood plays a hot blonde training with a lot of inept white cosmonauts and powerful, dominant blacks.
Watch how she is used to tease us with desire (:26) in the instant before the black man's fist punishes the formerly feisty white trainer (:29). The message: don't think, white man, that you can assert yourself when a black man is in dah house.
More sexual humiliation comes at 1:06. Stop the video there. Note the sexual position of Underwood in relation to the black man behind her, as if he has her in a doggystyle position.
She is straddling the limp white guy, who absolutely begs her for CPR: "Revive me!"
Underwood's expression at 1:08 indicates such an idea is repulsive to her. And at the moment that she rejects the white guy's pathetic advances, she is surrounded by victorious blacks.
Boycott: Vitaminwater, Coca-Cola
With their in-flight safety video, British Airways puts itself at the propagandizing spear-point in the fight for white genocide.
Imagine how many thousands of air travellers see this cartoon every day, all ages, all genders - all part of a captive audience: they are buckled up, literally strapped in, and forced to watch this not-so-subtle brainwashing material.
British Airways elite-sters know all about the mind's impressionability. Humans, like other primates, like to mimic the behavior they observe. Thus as much as British Airways folks think their video "represents" interracial mating patterns, it also encouragings and perpetuates those patterns: the white woman is here paired up with a black guy. They have a bi-racial child, who is literally the star of the show. People will think this is normal. And for the majority of the population, it is always desirable to be normal.
Meanwhile, thoughout the video, this fruitful, interracial union is contrasted with a white guy who is flying by himself, who is represented as pathetic, isolated, sterile in his solitude (1:47).
Will people wittingly change their mating patterns based on this video? Probably not. But the more these memes are reinforced, the more they take root in the subconscious of the young, where they are their most virulent. All you have to do is look around the streets of London to see the social changes that 50 years of such propaganda has elicited.
And, needless to say, no one is spreading this kind of propaganda in Vietnam, where a Vietnamese guy is flying by himself while a Vietnamese woman is flying and mating with a black guy.
No one is spreading this kind of propaganda in Mexico, where a Mexican guy is flying by himself while a Mexican woman is flying and mating with a black guy.
No one is spreading this kind of propaganda in Uganda, where a Ugandan guy is flying by himself while a Ugandan woman is flying and mating with a white guy.
No one is spreading this kind of propaganda in Japan, where a Japanese guy is flying by himself while a Japanese woman is flying and mating with a black guy.
No. This kind of social engineering propaganda is only created and disseminated in all white countries and only white countries.
Once again, it's Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, white countries for everybody.
Boycott: British Airways.
This little nagging man, lets call him a professional nagger, criss-crosses the nation in search of white enclaves in order to harass, demean, and generally nag their inhabitants.
Why would whites want to segregate themselves from other races? he implicitly asks, implicitly calling them raaayyyciss for wanting to do so. It's not like crime rates plummet when whites create homogenous communities or anything.
Or maybe the rates do fall, but who would want that? Isn't it much more fun and, er, vibrant, when our communities are multi-ethnic, multi-racial, multi-multi-multi?
What Mr Benjamin fails to see, and will never see until he climbs down off his moral high horse, is that:
no one is going into the jungles of the Amazon and telling the natives there that they are wrong to want to be among their own kind and encouraging them to mix with other races;
no one is going to cities in Japan that are 98 percent Japanese and telling them that they are wrong to want to be among their own kind and encouraging them to mix with other races;
no one is going into Chad, into small ethnic enclaves of blacks, and telling them that they are wrong to want to be among their own kind and encouraging them to mix with other races;
no one is going into Chinatown in Los Angeles and telling the ethnic Chinese that they are wrong to want to be among their own kind and encouraging them to mix with other races;
no one is going into exclusively black neighborhoods in Detroit and telling them that they are wrong to want to be among their own kind and encouraging them to mix with other races.
No. Only white communities are guilted into being diverse.
Mr. Benjamin thinks he is being anti-racist by making this documentary. Instead, he is just being Anti-White.
ANTI-RACISM IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE.
This is the original pilot of what became a multi-million dollar SuperBowl ad for Reebok in 2004.
Even in its infancy, it exudes a particular agenda, does it not?
Even at :12 we have the incompetent white male, making life hard for the other races. "If only this typical white guy wasn't so inconsiderate" this Asian woman thinks with a roll of her eyes, "maybe I would be able to enjoy my morning cup o' joe."
But fear not, Asian lady. The black man will avenge all wrongs perpetrated upon you by evil whitey.
Not only does this black guy assault the white man, he stands over him and teaches him how to be a respectable co-worker: "You kill da joe, yo make some mo! You know that shit baby!"
Hmm. Such violence. Such language. Surely no respectable multi-national corporation, such as Reebok, would have considered this pilot as a potential vehicle for their reputable product. Surely not.
Surely Reebok wouldn't endorse such violence against a young white man simply for socializing with a young white woman (:57), or the intimidation and humiliation of a white man simply for not recycling (1:35), or the crushing of a white man's collarbone (2:27) simply for...well, for being white.
Surely Reebok wouldn't endorse such criminal behavior or associate its brand with blatant Anti-White violence before a SuperBowl TV audience of millions?
Well, they did. And in our next post we will show you how this pilot was further developed--lovingly crafted into the multi-million dolar ad it became: an Anti-White Media classic.
Stay tuned!
