CNN: Blacks Can Segregate; When Whites Do It For Their Own Self-Interest, it's a "Scar."

More Anti-White buffoonery from CNN.

This commentator is perfectly willing to accept that blacks might have legitimate reasons for wanting to segregate themselves. But she calls it a "painful" "scar" (1:56) when whites try to do the same.

This whole conversation begs the question, which CNN refuses to acknowledge: If blacks might benefit from studying among all blacks, and women might benefit from studying among all women, and men might benefit from studying among only men, wouldn't whites benefit from studying among only whites? But in this whole video, never once does anyone ask what is good for whites.

Sure, 60 percent of whites do well on standardized tests, while only 1/3rd of blacks do well. But American whites still lag behind their counterparts in Scandinavia. Perhaps if there were no blacks in the classroom, whites would a) be able to focus more on their studies and b) not have their teacher dumb-down the lesson for the benefit of the black students in the class.

But of course CNN would never, NEVER ask what would benefit white students. They only want to "close the achievement gap" between blacks and whites by throwing yet more money at the problem with special "mentoring" programs for blacks. Well the more tax-funded special treatment and attention paid to blacks means less attention paid to teach whites. And whites suffer doubly. Once in taxation and again in the classroom.

CNN should do a story on how billions have been paid toward closing this "achievement gap" for half a century, but we have gotten nowhere.

But they never will do that story. Nor would they do a story on how whites would benefit academically from going to all white, segregated classrooms.

But no one is asking what would be best for whites.

CNN is Anti-White.

Cue Evil Music: White Australians Once Wanted to Stay White

Thanks to Scott from Australia for turning AWM on to this absurd little tax-funded documentary from Down Under, "Immigration Nation."

Cue evil music: "The commonwealth of Australia was built on a paradox." "The paradox was they were going to realize a utopia, but they were going to do it by excluding the vast majority of humanity."

Pardon, but that isn't a paradox. It's a means. There's nothing anti-utopian about being exclusive. In fact, utopias are built around the idea of an "intentional community," which involves a much higher degree of teamwork than other communities. This necessitates an in-group and out-group by definition.

What is a paradox, however, is that this documentary, which cries bloody murder any time any white person wants to form an exclusive or intentional community, was written by a jew (Sara Tiefenbrun) and commentated by a jew (Andrew Markus). We'll get to why their jewishness is paradoxical in a moment. But first, let's hear what they have to say:



Cue more evil music: "This meant tough restrictions on immigration."

What is really paradoxical is that while Andrew Markus lectures us in his intolerably smug way on how wrong it is for Australia to be white or to want to stay that way, he currently holds the Pratt Foundation Chair of Jewish Civilisation at Monash University. Hmm. Jewish Civilization? Now let's take a look at Israel's immigration policy. Hmm. What have we here? The Law of Return, an entirely race-based immigration policy that allows in only people who have jewish blood and excludes others. Nice one.

Any documentaries in the works about clearances of Palestinian land, Prof. Marcus? You lecture white Australians about their evil ways, for wanting to be explicitly white, while keeping silent on Israel's much stricter, race-based immigration policies. What a wee little, smug little hypocrite. You too, Sara.

This entire documentary is a study in faux history, duplicity, and double-standard. It constantly returns to the poor poor Japanese and Chinese, whom Australia meanly, cruelly, and fiendishly excluded. Never does it mention, however, that China and Japan currenly have, and historically have had, extremely exclusive immigration policies.

So whilst Prof. Markus lectures us like this:



he never informs us that in 1990 Japan passed its Immigration Control Act, still in effect, which allows only people who have Japanese blood to immigrate to Japan. So Japan and Israel have very similar, very strict, race-based immigration policies.

Oh so mean. So cruel. Why no outcry against the Japanese and Israelis? Why no tear-jerking photos of innocent little girls who died because they couldn't get into Japan and Israel?

What we have in this video series is blatant Anti-White Media, blatant New World Order claptrap, the protocols of which form a GLOBAL DOUBLE STANDARD:

Africa for the Africans. Asia for the Asians. White Countries for Everybody!

For more info, hop on over to WHITE RABBIT RADIO and check out the podcasts, starting with episode 1.

Or fly on over to BUGS.

The Anti-White Media Two-Step

Here Katie Couric reveals her masterful two-step Anti-White propaganda technique, her recipe for white genocide:

(Step 1) By implication, deny that whites have a culture, a history, any form of cohesion and make "racist" demons out of those who say otherwise. This will (Step 2) make it easier to convince them to blend.

Instructional video, illustrating Step 1:



(Ah Katie Couric, Anti-White Media priestess. See how she tightens the vice grips on Glenn Beck for DARING to even SAY the words "White Culture." How dare you, Glenn!)

Instructional video, illustrating Step 2:

Thursday Afternoon Compare and Contrast

So much of how we perceive our world in the modern age is through visceral comprehension of everything around us, particularly the linking between images and words. An individual, if presented with images of a common thread, each associated with negative descriptions, will internalize these things; this is almost certainly a determinable effect on some people when exposed to propaganda of similar ilk over, and over, and over. That is why it is called propaganda. These are all from CNN, same day, related articles through parallel linkage. Tell me this is a coincidence now, you slimy, evil anti-White racist apologists.

Your White boyfriend is a loser, and annoying. Unhappy relationships ensue with White men.