Exposing the Subtle and Blatant Ways in Which the Media Seeks to Denigrate, Humiliate, and Ultimately Exterminate People of European or Caucasian Descent, One Image at a Time.
Sunday, May 15, 2011
Three Cartoons. One Message.
Evil Whitey.
Innocent, pure non-white.
Teach those kiddies the new religion while they're too young to resist.
How interesting that this last cartoon leads onto something by 'Fear Of A Brown Planet', a scumbag "comedy" duo who's entire act and agenda revolves around mocking and insulting Australians, as they also work towards Australians losing their society. In line thus with the general anti-White agenda of each of these "cartoons"!
Can you tell me what about the cartoons is UNTRUE? If you can't, then I'm sorry that the truth is so unflattering. I guess we should stop telling the truth about white colonial history, right? If you look in the mirror and see your own ugliness, do you smash the mirror?
we never got a thank you for the free boat ride over here. ungrateful negroes. besides, it's better for our survival to take pride in being the epitome of evil (even though we aren't).
The only time "White" is used in history books is when slavery, segregation, Nazis, colonization etc. is in context. Not once does the education system ever explicitly admit to Whites, and especially White males as having good qualities.
I am having a discussion with a lady that says Sheri Shepherd (Ms. "where the black people at" from the View) is just on there to perpetuate a black stereotype. I directed her to this blog, but I don't know what good it will do. I can't believe they don't see Hollywood falls all over itself in portraying blacks in the most positive light, so much so as to be laughable. I watch a lot of crime dramas and I have never seen ONE black on white crime. Not one. Ugh... annoyed.
BTW, this is an amazing library...it might be good at some point to categorize all the posts for ease of access when arguing on the interwebz.
Anonymous said... "Can you tell me what about the cartoons is UNTRUE? If you can't, then I'm sorry that the truth is so unflattering. I guess we should stop telling the truth about white colonial history, right? If you look in the mirror and see your own ugliness, do you smash the mirror?"
Answer: Just about everything in them is grossly misleading and if you are so ill-informed as to believe this infantile, ahistorical, hate filled propaganda you have obviously never studied the British colonial period with any seriousness.
One contradiction you will have failed to notice because of your lack of honesty and scholarship is that the anti-white evangelists often spread mutually contradictory propaganda memes.
For exmaple, in "College Kids: learn your Anti-White History!" we have a son of a Jew explaining how violent and warlike white people were in Europe.
Then in Michael Moore's shallow and defamatory cartoon we are told that our ancestors were not fierce and warlike but were extremely fearful and cowardly.
Which is it anti-European bigots?
Are we primarily fearsome and warlike or are we totally fearful and cowardly?
My guess is that are you so blinded by jealousy and hatred that you don't care the least bit about accuracy and truth.
"Are we primarily fearsome and warlike or are we totally fearful and cowardly?"
Both. Cowards become bullies. Insecure people push others around. There is no contradiction.
Anywhere racists hang out (e.g. here), we see both FEAR of an imaginary 'white genocide' and AGGRESSION towards black people and other ethnic minorities. You yourselves are the best proof that fear and aggression go together.
I went to an all black school in south Chicago and my teacher played that Michael Moore cartoon in class...yay for reverse dicrimination, made it even worse for me! And anyhow, my ancestors came from Ireland just a few generations ago, I never owned slaves anyhow...but I still got the "you owe me for the past" attitude. & Got threatened daily.
"Can you tell me what about the cartoons is UNTRUE?"
I don't know much about Canadian and Australian history, so I'll just focus on the first cartoon. First, the Pilgrims did not travel to America out of fear. Back in the 17th Century, being at sea was much more dangerous than staying home. If they were motivated by fear, they won't have gone anywhere. And nobody got burned at the stake during the Salem Witch Trials. They were executed by hanging. And the trials did not stem from people being afraid of everything; they stemmed from the Puritans' feuds with each other. And the 2nd Amendment didn't come from white people being afraid of everything. It came from the idea that an armed populace is the best deterrent to tyranny. White slave traders didn't kidnap the slaves; they were actually captured by other blacks and then sold to the whites. Samuel Colt supported the Union in the Civil War, but the cartoon implies that he supported the Confederacy. The idea that the NRA was formed by KKK members is ridiculous. The KKK was made up of former Confederate soldiers, but the NRA was made up of former Union soldiers. And the suburbs were already becoming popular before the Montgomery Bus Boycott.
"First, the Pilgrims did not travel to America out of fear. Back in the 17th Century, being at sea was much more dangerous than staying home. If they were motivated by fear, they won't have gone anywhere."
Strawman. The video said "afraid of being persecuted". You have not disproven this. Instead you are trying to distract from this by talking about generic "fear" and mixing in irrelevancies such as fear of voyaging.
"And the trials did not stem from people being afraid of everything; they stemmed from the Puritans' feuds with each other."
Wordplay. Feuds start from one side perceiving a threat from the other, which can be described as being afraid of rival power. It is still fear.
"And the 2nd Amendment didn't come from white people being afraid of everything. It came from the idea that an armed populace is the best deterrent to tyranny."
More wordplay. To want to deter tyranny implies fear of tyranny. Still fear.
"White slave traders didn't kidnap the slaves; they were actually captured by other blacks and then sold to the whites."
If a kidnapper sold me his victim and I do not immediately free the victim after buying him, I am also guilty of kidnapping. Kidnapping by purchase is still kidnapping.
"Samuel Colt supported the Union in the Civil War, but the cartoon implies that he supported the Confederacy."
The cartoon implies nothing of the sort; it merely states he invented a gun.
"The idea that the NRA was formed by KKK members is ridiculous."
And the cartoon did not make such a claim. It merely said that "another group was founded"
By your logic, everything people do stems from fear. I wear a seatbelt when I drive, so I must have a fear of dying in a car accident. I brush my teeth, so I must have a fear of cavities. I exercise, so I must have a fear of having a heart attack. And the danger of travel is not irrelevant. The Pilgrims were being persecuted. If fear was their motivation, they would have just done what the government told them to do so they could end their persecution and live in safety. The Puritans were motivated by greed and nothing else. Nobody was a threat to anyone else’s power; everyone just wanted someone else’s property. And you don't get the point of the kidnapping scene. The scene was meant to make people think that blacks were completely innocent and whites were entirely to blame, when in fact they were both responsible for the slave trade. And the video does imply that Colt supported the Confederacy. He hands a revolver to a Southern white man who is afraid of his slaves. Then we see a bunch of Southern whites happy about their new revolvers, only to learn that, "It was too late. The North soon won the Civil War and the slaves were free." This clearly implies that he invented the revolver to help the Southern white men. And the video doesn't merely say that "another group was founded". The video shows two KKK members responding to their group being outlawed by taking off their robes and using guns to shoot a KKK sign until it spins around and becomes and NRA sign. How much more blatant does it have to be?
"By your logic, everything people do stems from fear."
The point is that much of American political history, even to this day, is based on fear. The size of the US defence budget is a good example. This idea of pre-emptive attacks on other countries perceived to be a threat is a good example. And of course the ridiculous notion propounded on this blog that there is a 'white genocide' going on is an even better example. The idea of the cartoon is to show a pattern which is still repeating itself because some people are too stupid to learn from it.
"Nobody was a threat to anyone else’s power; everyone just wanted someone else’s property."
If someone wanted your property, wouldn't you consider them a threat to you?
"The scene was meant to make people think that blacks were completely innocent and whites were entirely to blame, when in fact they were both responsible for the slave trade."
The black SLAVES were completely innocent, and they were the only ones who ended up in America. So, from the perspective of American history, which is what we are discussing, black Americans were completely innocent.
"the video does imply that Colt supported the Confederacy. He hands a revolver to a Southern white man who is afraid of his slaves"
All that shows is that the Southerners considered the revolver a useful weapon. Nothing in the video suggests Colt knew or cared what group he was supplying.
"The video shows two KKK members responding to their group being outlawed by taking off their robes and using guns to shoot a KKK sign until it spins around and becomes and NRA sign."
The point is that both the KKK and NRA are populated by the same personality type.
Anyway, from now on, every time I hear you guys shooting your mouths off about 'white genocide', the image I'll have in my mind is 1:51 of the video:
"OH NO, WE'RE GUHNA DIE!!!"
Please, take a step back and look at yourself. You are afraid of a cartoon that is making fun of how people like you are afraid of everything. Your white-genocide-under-every-rock attitude fits the exact stereotype that the cartoon portrays, but still you don't realize how accurate the cartoon is.
I do not have a white-genocide-under-every-rock attitude. I simply notice when media outlets produce entertainment that depicts whites as inferior to nonwhites. Noticing something I’m not supposed to notice and seeing something that isn’t there are two completely different things. You shouldn’t omit the blacks who didn’t become slaves just because they never ended up in America. This video may be about American history, but it includes a scene that takes place in Africa, so all Africans are relevant. The video doesn’t just show that the Southerners considered the revolver a useful weapon. Colt hands the slave owner his gun. If the creators of the video didn’t want to depict Colt as a supporter of the slave owners, they easily could have had him standing by himself, instead of showing him giving a gun to a slave owner. When the KKK members take off their robes, the point is to show that the KKK members responded to their group being outlawed by abandoning their costumes and changing their name. And the KKK and NRA aren’t populated by the same personality type. If they were, there wouldn’t be any nonwhite members of the NRA, and the NRA would be okay with gun bans in primarily nonwhite cities. And I’m not afraid of this cartoon. There’s a difference between being insulted and being afraid. I am certainly not afraid of everything. You don't know anything about my personality or how I formed my views on issues like race, so don’t pretend that you do.
well what would you do if you sailed to a new land and was met by savages that ate people, and did evil magic, and skinned you and your babies for a ritual ceremony. if you are of the devil you would join them, if not you would rid the land of them.
How interesting that this last cartoon leads onto something by 'Fear Of A Brown Planet', a scumbag "comedy" duo who's entire act and agenda revolves around mocking and insulting Australians, as they also work towards Australians losing their society. In line thus with the general anti-White agenda of each of these "cartoons"!
ReplyDeleteScott
Can you tell me what about the cartoons is UNTRUE? If you can't, then I'm sorry that the truth is so unflattering. I guess we should stop telling the truth about white colonial history, right? If you look in the mirror and see your own ugliness, do you smash the mirror?
ReplyDeletewe never got a thank you for the free boat ride over here. ungrateful negroes. besides, it's better for our survival to take pride in being the epitome of evil (even though we aren't).
ReplyDeleteIs that first one rally really by fat cunt Michael Moore?
ReplyDeleteSincerely,
crimesofthetimes.com
The only time "White" is used in history books is when slavery, segregation, Nazis, colonization etc. is in context. Not once does the education system ever explicitly admit to Whites, and especially White males as having good qualities.
ReplyDeleteGreat blog, I am a fan.
ReplyDeleteI am having a discussion with a lady that says Sheri Shepherd (Ms. "where the black people at" from the View) is just on there to perpetuate a black stereotype. I directed her to this blog, but I don't know what good it will do. I can't believe they don't see Hollywood falls all over itself in portraying blacks in the most positive light, so much so as to be laughable. I watch a lot of crime dramas and I have never seen ONE black on white crime. Not one. Ugh... annoyed.
BTW, this is an amazing library...it might be good at some point to categorize all the posts for ease of access when arguing on the interwebz.
Anonymous said...
ReplyDelete"Can you tell me what about the cartoons is UNTRUE? If you can't, then I'm sorry that the truth is so unflattering. I guess we should stop telling the truth about white colonial history, right? If you look in the mirror and see your own ugliness, do you smash the mirror?"
Answer: Just about everything in them is grossly misleading and if you are so ill-informed as to believe this infantile, ahistorical, hate filled propaganda you have obviously never studied the British colonial period with any seriousness.
One contradiction you will have failed to notice because of your lack of honesty and scholarship is that the anti-white evangelists often spread mutually contradictory propaganda memes.
For exmaple, in "College Kids: learn your Anti-White History!" we have a son of a Jew explaining how violent and warlike white people were in Europe.
Then in Michael Moore's shallow and defamatory cartoon we are told that our ancestors were not fierce and warlike but were extremely fearful and cowardly.
Which is it anti-European bigots?
Are we primarily fearsome and warlike or are we totally fearful and cowardly?
My guess is that are you so blinded by jealousy and hatred that you don't care the least bit about accuracy and truth.
"Are we primarily fearsome and warlike or are we totally fearful and cowardly?"
ReplyDeleteBoth. Cowards become bullies. Insecure people push others around. There is no contradiction.
Anywhere racists hang out (e.g. here), we see both FEAR of an imaginary 'white genocide' and AGGRESSION towards black people and other ethnic minorities. You yourselves are the best proof that fear and aggression go together.
I went to an all black school in south Chicago and my teacher played that Michael Moore cartoon in class...yay for reverse dicrimination, made it even worse for me! And anyhow, my ancestors came from Ireland just a few generations ago, I never owned slaves anyhow...but I still got the "you owe me for the past" attitude. & Got threatened daily.
ReplyDelete"Can you tell me what about the cartoons is UNTRUE?"
ReplyDeleteI don't know much about Canadian and Australian history, so I'll just focus on the first cartoon. First, the Pilgrims did not travel to America out of fear. Back in the 17th Century, being at sea was much more dangerous than staying home. If they were motivated by fear, they won't have gone anywhere. And nobody got burned at the stake during the Salem Witch Trials. They were executed by hanging. And the trials did not stem from people being afraid of everything; they stemmed from the Puritans' feuds with each other. And the 2nd Amendment didn't come from white people being afraid of everything. It came from the idea that an armed populace is the best deterrent to tyranny. White slave traders didn't kidnap the slaves; they were actually captured by other blacks and then sold to the whites. Samuel Colt supported the Union in the Civil War, but the cartoon implies that he supported the Confederacy. The idea that the NRA was formed by KKK members is ridiculous. The KKK was made up of former Confederate soldiers, but the NRA was made up of former Union soldiers. And the suburbs were already becoming popular before the Montgomery Bus Boycott.
"First, the Pilgrims did not travel to America out of fear. Back in the 17th Century, being at sea was much more dangerous than staying home. If they were motivated by fear, they won't have gone anywhere."
ReplyDeleteStrawman. The video said "afraid of being persecuted". You have not disproven this. Instead you are trying to distract from this by talking about generic "fear" and mixing in irrelevancies such as fear of voyaging.
"And the trials did not stem from people being afraid of everything; they stemmed from the Puritans' feuds with each other."
Wordplay. Feuds start from one side perceiving a threat from the other, which can be described as being afraid of rival power. It is still fear.
"And the 2nd Amendment didn't come from white people being afraid of everything. It came from the idea that an armed populace is the best deterrent to tyranny."
More wordplay. To want to deter tyranny implies fear of tyranny. Still fear.
"White slave traders didn't kidnap the slaves; they were actually captured by other blacks and then sold to the whites."
If a kidnapper sold me his victim and I do not immediately free the victim after buying him, I am also guilty of kidnapping. Kidnapping by purchase is still kidnapping.
"Samuel Colt supported the Union in the Civil War, but the cartoon implies that he supported the Confederacy."
The cartoon implies nothing of the sort; it merely states he invented a gun.
"The idea that the NRA was formed by KKK members is ridiculous."
And the cartoon did not make such a claim. It merely said that "another group was founded"
By your logic, everything people do stems from fear. I wear a seatbelt when I drive, so I must have a fear of dying in a car accident. I brush my teeth, so I must have a fear of cavities. I exercise, so I must have a fear of having a heart attack. And the danger of travel is not irrelevant. The Pilgrims were being persecuted. If fear was their motivation, they would have just done what the government told them to do so they could end their persecution and live in safety. The Puritans were motivated by greed and nothing else. Nobody was a threat to anyone else’s power; everyone just wanted someone else’s property. And you don't get the point of the kidnapping scene. The scene was meant to make people think that blacks were completely innocent and whites were entirely to blame, when in fact they were both responsible for the slave trade. And the video does imply that Colt supported the Confederacy. He hands a revolver to a Southern white man who is afraid of his slaves. Then we see a bunch of Southern whites happy about their new revolvers, only to learn that, "It was too late. The North soon won the Civil War and the slaves were free." This clearly implies that he invented the revolver to help the Southern white men. And the video doesn't merely say that "another group was founded". The video shows two KKK members responding to their group being outlawed by taking off their robes and using guns to shoot a KKK sign until it spins around and becomes and NRA sign. How much more blatant does it have to be?
ReplyDelete"By your logic, everything people do stems from fear."
ReplyDeleteThe point is that much of American political history, even to this day, is based on fear. The size of the US defence budget is a good example. This idea of pre-emptive attacks on other countries perceived to be a threat is a good example. And of course the ridiculous notion propounded on this blog that there is a 'white genocide' going on is an even better example. The idea of the cartoon is to show a pattern which is still repeating itself because some people are too stupid to learn from it.
"Nobody was a threat to anyone else’s power; everyone just wanted someone else’s property."
If someone wanted your property, wouldn't you consider them a threat to you?
"The scene was meant to make people think that blacks were completely innocent and whites were entirely to blame, when in fact they were both responsible for the slave trade."
The black SLAVES were completely innocent, and they were the only ones who ended up in America. So, from the perspective of American history, which is what we are discussing, black Americans were completely innocent.
"the video does imply that Colt supported the Confederacy. He hands a revolver to a Southern white man who is afraid of his slaves"
All that shows is that the Southerners considered the revolver a useful weapon. Nothing in the video suggests Colt knew or cared what group he was supplying.
"The video shows two KKK members responding to their group being outlawed by taking off their robes and using guns to shoot a KKK sign until it spins around and becomes and NRA sign."
The point is that both the KKK and NRA are populated by the same personality type.
Anyway, from now on, every time I hear you guys shooting your mouths off about 'white genocide', the image I'll have in my mind is 1:51 of the video:
"OH NO, WE'RE GUHNA DIE!!!"
Please, take a step back and look at yourself. You are afraid of a cartoon that is making fun of how people like you are afraid of everything. Your white-genocide-under-every-rock attitude fits the exact stereotype that the cartoon portrays, but still you don't realize how accurate the cartoon is.
I do not have a white-genocide-under-every-rock attitude. I simply notice when media outlets produce entertainment that depicts whites as inferior to nonwhites. Noticing something I’m not supposed to notice and seeing something that isn’t there are two completely different things. You shouldn’t omit the blacks who didn’t become slaves just because they never ended up in America. This video may be about American history, but it includes a scene that takes place in Africa, so all Africans are relevant. The video doesn’t just show that the Southerners considered the revolver a useful weapon. Colt hands the slave owner his gun. If the creators of the video didn’t want to depict Colt as a supporter of the slave owners, they easily could have had him standing by himself, instead of showing him giving a gun to a slave owner. When the KKK members take off their robes, the point is to show that the KKK members responded to their group being outlawed by abandoning their costumes and changing their name. And the KKK and NRA aren’t populated by the same personality type. If they were, there wouldn’t be any nonwhite members of the NRA, and the NRA would be okay with gun bans in primarily nonwhite cities. And I’m not afraid of this cartoon. There’s a difference between being insulted and being afraid. I am certainly not afraid of everything. You don't know anything about my personality or how I formed my views on issues like race, so don’t pretend that you do.
ReplyDeletewell what would you do if you sailed to a new land and was met by savages that ate people, and did evil magic, and skinned you and your babies for a ritual ceremony. if you are of the devil you would join them, if not you would rid the land of them.
ReplyDelete