Exposing the Subtle and Blatant Ways in Which the Media Seeks to Denigrate, Humiliate, and Ultimately Exterminate People of European or Caucasian Descent, One Image at a Time.
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
MGM Jews Transform Shakespeare Play into Temple of Blackworship
A blast from the not-too-distant past today: a 1993 version of Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing. It is interesting how a casting strategy can change the feel of the entire play, and turn a bucolic romantic comedy into a modern day talmudized lesson in blackworship.
With Denzel Washington cast as Don Pedro, we meet the flawless black leader of gangs of flawed whites. [Funny how Washington serves this function in yet another film, as he did in Unstoppable, in our last post].
On hearing of Don Pedro's approach, the white townspeople, male and female, young and old, become positively orgasmic with glee. The sexual nature of their excitement is suggested by the frantic undressing, the flurry of naked white butts that hurry into warm foamy suds, women powdering their breasts--all to welcome the mighty, broad-smiling black prince.
I wouldn't be so bothered by this casting decision if, like Othello, the character of Don Pedro had any historical ties to Africa (though it would seem that even Othello should essentially be a Moroccan instead of a sub-Saharan negro).
But the character of Don Pedro is based on Peter III of Aragon, who was no Moor. In fact, he learned military lore from his father's reconquista against the Moors. He represented the white European re-conquest of the Iberian Peninsula against invading hordes of Africans.
It is thus a double slap in the face that this white masterpiece (the play itself) about a white hero (Pedro) becomes nothing more than another Jewish tool to disseminate the meme of blackworship.
Typical pink rabbit move.
The more I see Denzel Washington.
ReplyDeleteThe more I hate him.
That is fucking sickening.
ReplyDeletecrimesofthetimes.com
But he looks so damn noble
ReplyDelete...like some sort of noble savage or something.
"modern day talmudized lesson in blackworship"
ReplyDeleteSo what do you think of Tom Cruise's role in The Last Samurai? (The real Satsuma Rebellion involved no white samurai.) Was that film a "modern day talmudized lesson in whiteworship"?
I despised The Last Samurai because it centered on a race traitor. It was a talmudized lesson on the virtues of White people betraying everything they once stood for.
ReplyDeleteThank you, thank you for keeping a chronicle of the relentless debasement of our culture and hate crimes against Whites. I like to think of it as developing a massive forensic criminal case against the real Klan and Nazis.
ReplyDeleteI don't know if you're familiar with the sickening Pepsi commercial that debuted on the 2011 "Superbowl," but it was despicable. Considering the staggering levels of black-on-white crime, the creators (and I do not believe a white would have done so unless completely demented) of the following commercial are blatantly legitimatizing and advocating violence against whites. It did cause controversy the following day and was picked up by the mainstream Jews' News. But I'll be damned if the controversy wasn't co-opted by blacks as racist AGAINST black woman since it depicted them as violent, manipulative shrews. Make no mistake, they are openly encouraging and sanctioning violence against whites. Also, you really should consider adding Newnationnews.org to your roster of recommended reading sites since they keep a running compilation of the sheer horror and commonality of black-on-white crime. Moreover, Professor MacDonald's "OccidentalDissent," Jeff Rense's "Rense.com", Brother Nathanael Kapner's "RealZionistNews," Phillip Marlowe's "Incogman.net, Professor David Duke's "whitecivilrights" and his awesome videos, http://incogman.net/david-duke-videos/ are all critically important websites that merit consideration as well. http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t778889/ Moron Bill O' Reilly giving blacks an audience for turning it into a "racist stereotyping of blacks" (with absolutely no acknowledgement by O' Reilly of the anti-white sub-text of the ad) http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bill-oreilly-attempts-to-comprehend-racial-undertones-in-controversial-pepsi-ad/
"I despised The Last Samurai because it centered on a race traitor. It was a talmudized lesson on the virtues of White people betraying everything they once stood for"
ReplyDeleteSo when a black actor plays a hero in a white community, you say it is "anti-white".
By that logic, when a white actor plays a hero in an Asian community, it should be considered "anti-Asian". But according to you, no! That's "anti-white" too!
In that case, wouldn't a black actor playing a hero in a white community be "anti-black"? According to you, no! That's "anti-white" too!
Next you'll be telling me 2+2=5, and if I disagree I am "anti-white". And if I agree I am still "anti-white". Just because you say so.
AN ANTI-WHITE IS NOT SOMEONE WHO HATES WHITE PEOPLE, IT'S ANYONE WHOM WHITE RACISTS HATE.
No dumbass. The thing about The Last Samurai (also Avatar) is it is the ultimate guilty White liberal wet dream. It is their dream to reach out to the non-whites and lead them in destroying White civilization and society. Hell, didn't John Wayne play Genghis Khan at one point? I mean really, wtf?
ReplyDeleteWay to go off on a string of straw man and slippery slope arguments. A nigger in a White role doesn't mean it is anti-nigger (the reciprocal being White in non-white role is anti-white). Is Heimdall being played by a nigger in the upcoming Thor movie anti-nigger? Of course not. It's only the "whitest of the gods" (played by a nigger) in a position that is to be idolized and worshiped.
I love how you all caps WHITE RACIST. I can feel your anger seething through the screen that way. You are partly right though. I, as a (self-admitted) WHITE RACIST, hate anti-whites. But I only hate them because of their anti-white ACTIONS (like advocating open borders immigration, diversity, race-mixing, everything this website chronicles, etc.). They earned my hatred of them because of their obvious hatred for (in many cases) their own race.
Another bit of truth from AWM!
ReplyDeleteWhite News For White People:
http://malevolentfreedom.org/
"A nigger in a White role doesn't mean it is anti-nigger (the reciprocal being White in non-white role is anti-white)."
ReplyDeleteWhy not? Can it not be interpreted as black people needing to seek acceptance in a white society, the exact same way you accuse Tom Cruise of needing to seek acceptance in an Asian society? You can't have it both ways.
"It is their dream to reach out to the non-whites and lead them in destroying White civilization and society."
What if I said that Denzel Washington playing Don Pedro represents a dream of black Uncle Toms to reach out to non-blacks and lead them in destroying black civilization and society?
"I, as a (self-admitted) WHITE RACIST, hate anti-whites."
Excellent. Spoken just like a Jew who hates "anti-Semites". We all know what the Jew really means: he hates people who expose Jewish racism. Just like you hate people who expose white racism.
"Anti-white" is just what you call people in order to avoid confronting the ugly truth of the atrocities perpetrated by whites through centuries of colonialism. You say you are against open borders immigration, so let's hear you denounce the white people who settled America, Australia, Africa, and elsewhere without caring what the existing inhabitants thought about it. Oh wait: it is "anti-white" to point this out, right?
Complaining about something being "anti-white" (or "anti-Semitic") is like complaining to a mirror for showing a scar on your face - it's not the mirror's fault!
The primary audience for Last Samuri was white - they are the target.
ReplyDeleteIts not a Japanese film being made for a Japanese audience imploring them to take a whiet into their hearts, its showing a white transcending his race.
Much Ado is not Denzel transcending his race, its about him replacing a white character. At no time does the film acknowledge his being black, its not noticed. The way in which no one notices the main characters singing in a musical.
Exactly, when I saw Last Samurai I hated the evil white Americans and felt empathy for the poor oppressed Japanese people... Obviously Japanese people love the technological wonders brought by the evil white men.
DeleteWatching white girls getting horny and butt naked when they see a black knight arrive is quite disturbing.
LS is specifically set in Japan with Japanese people. TC is clearly the outsider the white trying to accepted, transcending race and culture.
ReplyDeleteTrying to live up to their codes.
In MAAN we are shown DW as just another character, black, white all rendered meaningless. He isnt shown as a black man aspiring to be like the white aristocratic warrior types he is surrounded by, thats just taken for granted, he is their equal or better.
I could go and on.
Anyhow anon's attempt to counter Much Ado with Last Samurai is a complete crock, obviously.
"The primary audience for Last Samuri was white - they are the target."
ReplyDeleteAs a matter of fact, The Last Samurai was heavily promoted in Japan and took in more at the Japanese box office than in the American box office.
"At no time does the film acknowledge his being black, its not noticed."
Then what are you complaining about in the first place? Why not just ignore Denzel Washington's race and just concentrate on what the movie is actually about?
Much Ado About Nothing also stars Kenneth Branagh as Benedick. Yet I don't see you complaining that Branagh is an Irishman replacing an Italian! Either complain about all the actors who do not match the character's background, or none.
As a matter of fact, The Last Samurai was heavily promoted in Japan and took in more at the Japanese box office than in the American box office.
ReplyDeleteMaybe, but the white audience was the primary target.
For a white audience it shows a white man trying to live up the (superior) values of 'the other'. See also Dances With Wolves, Avatar. In the case of a Japanese audience it pays them a compliment, a white trying to be as good as them.
"At no time does the film acknowledge his being black, its not noticed."
Then what are you complaining about in the first place? Why not just ignore Denzel Washington's race and just concentrate on what the movie is actually about?
The fact that it doesnt acknowledge he is black is the whole fucking point!
He is just 'there', dropped into a white society without explanation. He doesnt have to strive for acceptance like Tom Cruise in TLS. He appears to be there as of right. It being normal for a black man to have his alpha status amongst white nobility. That white society can just absorb the likes of him without a glitch.
Whether white society can in fact absorb certain black individuals is not the point because its never an issue in the film. It portrays such as an entirely natural, normal state of affairs.
Thank you for ignoring the last paragraph of my previous comment:
ReplyDelete"Much Ado About Nothing also stars Kenneth Branagh as Benedick. Yet I don't see you complaining that Branagh is an Irishman replacing an Italian! Either complain about all the actors who do not match the character's background, or none."
Tell us why you complain about Denzel Washington but not Kenneth Branagh. Is it normal for an Irishman to dropped into an Italian society without explanation?
In the Last Samurai, Tom Cruise starred as morally bankrupt, and spiritually lost American soldier Nathan Algren. He is filled with deep guilt due to his involvement in the slaughter of American Indians (shown in flashback). Only after coming into contact with Samurai and their "superior" Eastern philosophy of honor does he find his way. This same plot has been rehashed a million times from Mutiny on the Bounty to Dances with Wolves to Avatar. It's still the myth of the noble savage. Having Denzel play Don Pedro is an entirely different situation. He is not a flawed black man who finds salvation through spiritually superior whites.
ReplyDeleteThankyou anon at 4:45 PM. Someone gets it.
ReplyDeleteMeanwhile....
That fact that our liberal pal has sunk to pointing out that Kenneth Branagh is not Italian shows we are in the end game on this one. OK lets go with that.
Are any of the rest of the cast Italian? Are any of them speaking Italian? Lets also point out that in the periods the film and source play are set, in neither case did Italy yet exist. When the the play was written, Sicily was under the rule of Aragon - hence the Spanish sounding name Don Pedro. Does the movie have anyone speaking Spanish?
"Are any of the rest of the cast Italian?"
ReplyDeletePrecisely. Branagh was just one example. If you prefer, I can cite Emma Thompson, or Keanu Reeves, or someone else. The point is that the background of actors rarely match the background of the characters, so either complain about all cases where they do not match, or none. Anything else is inconsistent.
My question, which you are STILL ducking, is: why complain only about Denzel Washington and not Kenneth Branagh, despite neither of them being of the same ethnic background as the characters they play? Why the double-standard?
Get mad over a White playing the role of a different ethnic White? Oh please, get real. That's nothing compared to Denzel, a completely different race (ethnicities are different branches within the same racial group).
ReplyDeleteNow that I have answered, will you stop ducking the points the other anons have made regarding TLS?
"Get mad over a White playing the role of a different ethnic White?"
ReplyDeleteThank you for finally admitting that you base judgement on the arbitrary category known as "whiteness". That was all I was looking for. Because now it comes down to which arbitrary category we choose to focus on. For example, if I chose the category "Mediterranean" (which, incidentally, is a better defined racial group than "white"), then I have as much reason as you to be mad at non-Mediterraneans playing Mediterraneans. Your complaing is no more valid than mine; it all depends on what we focus on.
"That's nothing compared to Denzel, a completely different race (ethnicities are different branches within the same racial group)."
You see, you are assuming that there is only one way to categorize people into races. The truth is that people can be, and have been, categorized into races in any number of ways. For example, "white" is just one branch within the Caucasoid racial group. What is an 'ethnicity' depends on what you choose as a 'race', which is entirely arbitrary; there is nothing objective about it.
"Now that I have answered, will you stop ducking the points the other anons have made regarding TLS?"
But I'm not the one complaining! I have no problem with The Last Samurai. I just brought it up to show that you guys will complain about anything.
This is just trollin, the point is that DW is black. The society that created MAAN, the movie, the play wahtever were whitre. Nothing to do with blacks.
ReplyDeleteYou dicking around pretending that its no different casting a Brit as an Italian or a black is nonsense.
Brit or Itlaina those are white ethnicities or nationalities. Wheeeling in DW is a whole order of difference again.
"You dicking around pretending that its no different casting a Brit as an Italian or a black is nonsense."
ReplyDeleteExplain to me how. It all depends on where you draw the line. The line of "whiteness" is no more and no less arbitrary than any other line. That is what you racists can't seem to see past. You have this delusion that non-racists are "asleep" and need "awakening" by looking at your propaganda. No, I've been looking at your propaganda for years, and I still find it as asinine as when I first encountered it, simply because I reject the category of "whiteness" in the first place. The only people you will fool are those who can't think for themselves and who accept whatever categories they are given.
"Brit or Itlaina those are white ethnicities or nationalities. Wheeeling in DW is a whole order of difference again."
What about Natalie Portman and Scarlett Johanson (both Jews) as the Boleyn sisters in The Other Boleyn Girl? Why not complain about them?
And I'd love to hear you guys complain about the cast of The Scorpion King.
Dear anonymous, there are none so blind as those who refuse to see. We can't help you because you refuse to be helped. That is all.
ReplyDeletethe fact is negroes are more racist than the average white because of the huge amount of black on white crime.80%of negroes are borne out of wedlock to women with IQ of less than 100 and will end up in negro college but not before they commit 100,s of crimes against white people.of course this is never mentioned by the media and most of these crimes are buried so you won't know what negroes are up to.how quick the kidnapping rape torture and murder of a white couple by racist negroes in knoxville was buried by the lame stream media.negroes hate white people.
ReplyDeleteExplain to me how. It all depends on where you draw the line. The line of "whiteness" is no more and no less arbitrary than any other line.
ReplyDeleteOh no it isnt, it speaks volumes.
Human accomplishments, society are dependant on the people within them. Duh! If you arbitarily include the population of Africa with the population who invented the the internet for example then you will learn nothing useful about who created it. In fact if you actually mixed the two populations it would not be invented at all. Obviously.
simply because I reject the category of "whiteness"
Then you are stupid fuck and there is no reasoning with you.
Broad racial categories are not arbitary, no matter how much you want them to be.
Natalie & Scarlett - both half-jewish for starters. Yes there is an issue ther, but ethnically they are much closer to European. If they play a part we are not being fooled in the same sense.
The shylock caracter comes from Shakespeare's Marchant of Venice, where the shylock is the Jew.
ReplyDeleteAnon 8:25 - "Hell, didn't John Wayne play Genghis Khan at one point? I mean really, wtf?"
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfQsXrhF2X4