Friday, November 5, 2010
Join the Multiculti Coalition...or Die!
This one, too, is subtle, but simultaneously over-the-top, seemlessly blending Race-Replacementianity (the new anti-white religion) and hippie-liberal feel-good globalist environmentalism.
Note the lilly white class dappled in golden light listening listlessly as their hippie teacher drones on about being good to the environment.
Note how the casing director thought it would be nice if it was the black kid who here (:14) adopts a vaguely threatening tone (what teacher would put up with such lip?) and challenges the liberal hippie agenda.
But oh, no worries. See how he is soon won over, and forms a coalition with the lilly white liberals. See how they pair up in their endorsement of the scheme? (:40)
You had better pair up. You. White loners. Sitting by yourselves. Philip and Tracy. You must integrate into our liberal worldview or you will die.
And not only will you die, but we will slay you without a second thought. With a casual flick of the index finger you'll be exploded into a repulsive goo.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yeah I've seen this commercial. It's frigging weird.
ReplyDeleteIf it's made by hippie types then it may back fire on them.
Which has been happening more and more. The hippie types are showing their true colors. COMMIES
You must be in the UK. One other thing I found strange about this. Is where the White girl is named Jemimah. Here in the US that's an old stereo type name for black house maids.
You know Aunt Jemimah pancakes.
I read something today that says it all.
' Every time you watch TV. The jew takes a dump in your soul. '
' Every time you watch TV. The jew takes a dump in your soul. '
ReplyDelete-ha! classic!
The negative white examples of Philip and Tracy are more than compensated by the positive white examples of Jemima and most of the other kids who raise their hands. This clip is not anti-white.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I didn't notice any "threatening tone" or "challenge" from the black kid at all; he was just asking a simple and genuine question. I suspect it is your own bias against black people that makes you hear a "threatening tone" where there is none.
Yes this is a strange one to get your head around. Yet it still shows blacks in what you would assume is a White Country.
ReplyDeleteThis is wrong. They should be back in Africa.
"Yet it still shows blacks"
ReplyDeleteYou racists just sink lower and lower. Now just SHOWING black people makes a clip anti-white?Surely the point of showing people of many ethnic backgrounds is to point out that environmentalism affects all groups and requires the attention of all groups, which is true.
"what you would assume is a White Country"
The accent of the people in the clip sounds British, so I'll assume it's set in Britain. Britain voluntarily gave up being a white country from the first day it engaged in colonialism.
Enoch Powell warned the British back in the 60s about the consequences of the mass immigration.
ReplyDeletePrior to that I'm sure GB had stiff policies.
Here in the U.S. our Founding Fathers wrote in the first Naturalization Acts of 1790 1795 1800 that in order to be a citizen you had to be WHITE.
We stayed that way pretty much until the 60s as well. When the Commie ( jew ) liberals open the flood gates.
The Bible teaches as God instructed ( The Tower of Babel ) that Nations were to be built on the foundation of race.
We're not racist . Were racial. Non Whites, with the help of jews and White race traitors have stolen our lands from us.
Why is it we never here you folks that accuse us of being racist, stand up for the Whites in South Africa that have had their country taken from them and given to the blacks ?
Hypocrite. Some of us see through the BS and more of us Whites are waking up or have grown tired of trying to get along with non Whites.
So we've given up. Multi culturalism is a false doctrine. It does work.
Races should live separately. So if your not White. I'll ask you nicely. Please go back to your own Country.
"Britain voluntarily gave up being a white country from the first day it engaged in colonialism."
ReplyDeletea) No. Britain only gave up being a white country after the non-white importation programmes started in 1948. China colonized parts of the Philippines. Does this mean China has ceded the right to be Chinese. No. You have one standard for white countries and one for non-white contries. This makes you anti-white. Anti-racist is just a code word for anti-white.
b) The Brits never voted on whether to cede their rights to be white. So they didn't "voluntarily" give up anything.
Notice how every single person killed in the video is White. There are plenty of nigs and other foreigners available in the video but none of those were killed.
ReplyDeleteThe most disturbing clip was the classroom one.
Notice how the 2 White children who refuse to go along with the agenda both have Aryan names that are not of biblical origin. Phillip and Tracy.
I do not think that it is a coincidence that they are not named Josh and Sarah.
I predict that in the near future they will make similar advertisements promoting race mixing.
Teacher: Ok kids just before you leave I want to get a show of hands to see how many of you are on board with the brilliant new government sponsored Rainbow Society Initiative where we all pledge to blend and intermarry to create a more vibrant, peaceful, and healthy society for everyone to enjoy. If we all follow the principle of strength through diversity we can make the world a better place.
*Dysgenic-gutter-slut-in-training Jemima clasps her hand together with the paw of her not-yet-fully-grown-ground-ape friend sitting next to her and they both raise their arms up high*
Jemima: I can't wait to have a beautiful caramel coloured baby!
Teacher: That's splendid Jemima!
*All the children raise their hands except Phillip and Tracy*
Teacher: Phillip? Tracy? You don't want to participate? *Disapproving look on face of teacher*
Teacher: Oh, well that's a shame but you don't have to if you don't want to. There's no pressure.
*Presses button*
*Phillip and Tracy explode and soak the classroom with blood*
Teacher: Remember kids, embrace diversity!
"the brilliant new government sponsored Rainbow Society Initiative"
ReplyDeleteHahah. I can see it now.
"Britain only gave up being a white country after the non-white importation programmes started in 1948."
ReplyDeleteNo, as soon as you have no problem with moving into other people's lands (ie. beginning of colonialism), you lose the right to have a problem with other people moving into your land.
"China colonized parts of the Philippines."
So China should allow immigration of Filipinos. And it does. Similarly Britain should allow immigration of people from all former British Empire lands. The only placed from which it is entitled to refuse immigration are places it has never colonized.
"You have one standard for white countries and one for non-white contries."
No I don't.
"Anti-racist is just a code word for anti-white."
Bob Whitaker does not impress anyone.
"The Brits never voted"
When the British people saw their own country engaging in colonialism, they neither protested against their government nor did they boycott the colonialists. (On the contrary, they were generally proud of and happy with the British Empire.) That means they collectively accepted colonialism. That means they must now accept immigration from former colonial lands.
Sorry your logic has me at a loss.
ReplyDeleteAre you saying that because the British colonized other Countries that they must now take people of those other Countries into theirs ?
Nobody HAS to allow that. And they're stupid if they do.
"Are you saying that because the British colonized other Countries that they must now take people of those other Countries into theirs ?"
ReplyDeleteThat is correct. You only have a right for as long as you respect that same right for others. When you violate that right, you declare that others need no longer observe that same right when it comes to dealing with you. What part of this don't you understand?
Wrong . The British don't have to allow this. They chose to.
ReplyDeleteJust like the Americans chose to make freed African slaves citizens.
But these two countries could choose tomorrow to strip non Whites of these rights. Based solely on the fact they're not White.
"They chose to."
ReplyDeleteAnd it was the right choice, based on the reasoning I went over above. That's the point.
This is why racists can never take the moral high ground: because they are demanding people to ignore what is ethical and do what is selfish.
Well I have to disagree with your ' reasoning '.
ReplyDeleteAnd moral high ground. If you believe the Bible, God instructed mankind to form separate Nations based on race. Not to interbreed.
I believe He's the best One to speak about what's moral.
But even if you don't ascribe to that. History shows that separate Nations based on race are more harmonious Nations.
Just admit that it's you that's actually the racist here. In that you want to take over the White race countries.
Then you can take the moral high ground too. For a change.
"History shows that separate Nations based on race are more harmonious Nations."
ReplyDeleteThen why did the British engage in colonialism? This is what I'm talking about: it's OK when they move into other's lands, but not OK when others move into their lands?
Anon, I'm afraid your "whites deserve to be race-replaced because they had colonies" argument doesn't get you very far.
ReplyDeleteAs I said on another thread, you have TWO RULES. A double standard. One for Europeans and one for the rest of humanity: The Chinese colonized the Philippenes. But no one is calling for China to embrace multiculturalism.
The Moors took Spain. But you're not screaming for Europeans to move into Morocco in droves.
The Turks invaded and colonized Eastern Europe countless times in the past 500 years. But Turkey isn't forced to open its borders. Turkey has extremely strict immigration policies. But you still want Europeans (even Europeans like the Swiss who never had colonies) to take in the rest of the world and if they don't they are Naziswhokillsixmillionjews!
"When the British people saw their own country engaging in colonialism, they neither protested against their government"
ReplyDeleteThis is simply untrue. There was always a debate about the extent of imperialism. From nineteenth century "Little Englanders" to fiction writers Aphra Behn, William Blake, and Joseph Conrad, there were always people who critiqued and rejected imperialism.
But the bigger point is this: You seem to have a weird guilt complex that often afflicts judaized whites liberals. You really think that we must accept an original sin, accept our own race-replacement because of the real and imagined crimes of our ancestors. I simply disagree with you. There is no original sin.
And you continue to have this double standard. Turks enslaved the Russians for hundreds of years. I do not see you calling for Russia to colonize Turkey out of a sense of justice or vengeance. You have TWO RULES.
And yes I quote Whitaker. What of it? You have your schools of thought established by the Anglosphere elites from ClintonBushObama to BlairBrownCameron. I consider YOUR school to be FAR more destructive on the geopolitical scene. Get out of Afpak and then we'll talk.
I answered about China and Turkey in the other thread.
ReplyDelete"The Moors took Spain. But you're not screaming for Europeans to move into Morocco in droves"
They did that already.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Morocco
"there were always people who critiqued and rejected imperialism."
Yes, there were individuals opposed to imperialism, but the bottom line is that they didn't succeed in stopping it. So Britain is still responsible. In the same way, there are a few individual Israelis who are against Israel, but they aren't succeeding in taking down their state by themselves, so Israel still deserves to be bombed.
"And yes I quote Whitaker. What of it?"
It doesn't impress anyone, as I said. I would prefer actual arguments.
"You have your schools of thought established by the Anglosphere elites from ClintonBushObama to BlairBrownCameron."
You think I support these Zionist tools? You are mistaken. I was against invading Iraq and Afghanistan, and I am for a nuclear Iran, and I would love to see the fall of Israel and the total disappearance of Jews from the planet. Does that sound like Anglosphere elite to you?
GARY: "Notice how the 2 White children who refuse to go along with the agenda both have Aryan names that are not of biblical origin. Phillip and Tracy."
ReplyDeleteYou are keen to observe this. I don't think anything like this is accidental anymore and I wouldn't be surprised if some self-righteous jews wrote this commercial.
ANON: "Yes, there were individuals opposed to imperialism, but the bottom line is that they didn't succeed in stopping it. So Britain is still responsible."
Hold on there turbo. So can I hold you RESPONSIBLE for the invasion of Afpak and Iraq? I am assuming you are British or American. You were against these invastions, as you say. But you failed to stop them. By that logic I, too, am responsible. Should we both then be bombed and genocided out of existence out of karmic justice? So you're saying that there should be no difference between the punishment of the guilty warmongers (ClintonBushObama and BlairBrownCameron and Netan-yahoo/Wolfowitz/Frum/Krauthammer/Ledeen)and the punishment of the peace-promoting innocent (presumably yourself and myself)? All should be consigned to your weird penal code. Guilt by association? Is that it?
"I would love to see...the total disappearance of Jews from the planet."
Wow. I am no friend of the jews either, but I just think it is funny that liberals are always the first to call white nationalists "racist." And here you are, an anti, being REALLY FUCKING racist. It's actually cool in a way. Just let it all out. Don't pull any punches.
It is funny that you are so sensitive about protecting groups from "colonialism" (except the retroactive kind seems ok for you, meted out on all distantly-associated parties, as punishment) But you would feel morally justified in wiping out an entire group you feel you can collectively judge. Is this because the jews are the worlds perennial colonization engine? I am just trying to grasp your logic. I think a lot of jews should be imprisoned for being usurous assholes. And there will likely be armed struggle against them again in various forms for various reasons.
Is it that you want to genocide them because you see them as white, just because of their skin color? We have determined, I think, that you want to genocide all whites and only whites.
Just curious.
"Should we both then be bombed and genocided out of existence out of karmic justice?"
ReplyDeleteI could not morally complain if that happened. Of course it wouldn't be pleasant, but it was hardly pleasant for the Iraqis either, NONE of whom did anything to warrant it. (I assume you agree 9/11 was done by Israel.)
"an anti, being REALLY FUCKING racist."
No, I am not racist, I have simply had enough of Jewish racism, which depends on a Jewish identity to function, therefore I want to see the Jewish identity disappear.
"But you would feel morally justified in wiping out an entire group you feel you can collectively judge."
Actually, I would like to avoid violence if possible. I would prefer sterilization to massacre.
"Is this because the jews are the worlds perennial colonization engine?"
That and much more. The whole worldview inspired by Judaism (and heavily reflected in Western civilization) is also abhorrent.
"Is it that you want to genocide them because you see them as white, just because of their skin color?"
No. It's because they see themselves as Chosen People who are more important than other groups. Much like white racists see whites as Chosen People who are more important than other groups.
"We have determined, I think, that you want to genocide all whites and only whites."
No, I want the disappearance of ALL identities that lead to racism, whichever they may be.
ANON: "No, I want the disappearance of ALL identities that lead to racism, whichever they may be."
ReplyDeleteGood luck with that one.
I agree with you about the holohoax, but I'm afraid that's about as far as my agreement goes.
For someone who despises jews so much, you sure do buy into their main brand: hippie style anti-racism. The modern idea of “racism” was invented by jews to be used as a wedge for money drainage and political coin, to strip power and control from whites who had it. Your view here is a slippery slope to not just genocide of my race, the white race, but also genocide of all peoples. I think you would wish the world just to be rid of humans. I think that’s what you want.
You want the genocide of all groups that in the past have been naughty by your (I still think strange and arbitrary) measure. To me, no man is inherently "naughty" or stained by some ancestral or a-priori taint, whether it be by colonialism-by-association or some other Original Sin. Men who commit crimes should be punished for THEIR deeds.
Again, you sure think like a jew for someone so entirely fixated on despising them. Jews are masters at guilt-assignation-by-association (especially if the supposed guilty are whites and they can make a buck off of grievance pimping). They still have modern Germans by the balls for the imagined sins of their grandfathers. You think I should self-immolate to pay reparations to the non-white world for white domination? I have nothing for which to apologise. As a pagan, as a naturalist Nietzschean, I say: dominate or be dominated.
While you’re waiting to be executed for your failure to stop the war in Iraq, I will continue to rage on in pursuit of the perps who done it, vent myself upon the world for my own causes and for my own existence.
You’re a passive self-immolator. I am an active self-affirmer. That’s all there is to it and I don’t think we’ll convince each other to be otherwise.
"The modern idea of “racism” was invented by jews"
ReplyDeleteIf racism was invented by Jews, it was not modern. It is in their Torah and Talmud, which tells them that they are Chosen People and mandates a double-standard of behavior, one standard between Jews, another standard between Jews and non-Jews. THAT is the racism I am against, no matter who practices it.
"Your view here is a slippery slope to not just genocide of my race, the white race, but also genocide of all peoples."
I am against IDENTITIES, not against people. I want people to stop self-identifying as whites, blacks, Asians, Hispanics, etc.. If it take race mixing to accomplish this, then very well. I am not advocating killing actual people.
"Men who commit crimes should be punished for THEIR deeds."
I agree, but you have to look at it as a gang situation. Not all members of a crime gang actually commit a given crime, but the crime is driven by the interests of the gang ie. all of the gang PROFIT from it, and are prepared to cover up the crime or protect the criminal. That is what races are - GANGS. Therefore anyone who chooses to self-identify as a member of the gang (race) even after knowing the kind of crimes done by some of its members IS complicit in the crimes. Everyone has a choice to refuse to self-identify with any gang (race); if they so self-identify nonetheless, who but themselves can they blame when they are targeted for the crimes of that gang (race)?
Who would WANT to be Jewish after reading the Torah and Talmud? Who would WANT to be white after reading the history of colonialism? Who would WANT to be Chinese, Japanese, etc. after reading about their sordid pasts? RACISTS, that's who, people who have no conscience whatsoever.
Are these all active criminals? No. But as long as these identities exist that make each group think others are less important than themselves, the crimes will go on.
All the really good-hearted people I know do not self-identify with the race that they would be described as belonging to based on appearance. These are the people I trust to build a better world.
"you sure think like a jew for someone so entirely fixated on despising them"
No, YOU think like a Jew. You want a white homeland just like Jews want Israel. We should start calling you a White Zionist just to make clear what White Nationalists really are. You call everything you don't like "anti-white" just like Jews call everything they don't like "anti-Semitic". You talk about "white genocide" just like Jews talk about the "Holocaust". I'm pretty sure you are no fan of Islam either, just like Jews aren't.
"As a pagan, as a naturalist Nietzschean, I say: dominate or be dominated."
As followers of Judaism, Jews say exactly the same thing.
"vent myself upon the world for my own causes and for my own existence"
As Jews do. The name of the god of the Jews, YHWH, means "I AM". This sums up the entire disgusting Jewish survivalist mentality, which (I am sorry to say) is also your mentality.
"You’re a passive self-immolator. I am an active self-affirmer."
No, I am not passive. I fight for causes too, just not for selfish causes. (Fyi, a racial identity is still a 'self', just a bigger one. As you yourself say, you are a self-affirmer, and you are a racist, so you see how the two are related.) So be what you are. Just don't have any vain delusion of being different to Jews, because you are EXACTLY THE SAME.
As the world starts laughing in scorn every time Jews use the word "anti-Semite" (thanks to the activism of people like myself), so the world will also start laughing in scorn every time white racists use the word "anti-white" (thanks to the activism of people like myself).
No. The jews want identity FOR THEMSELVES AND ONLY FOR THEMSELVES. Everyone else must blend their identity away.
ReplyDeleteRead the Culture of Critique by K. MACDONALD.
You'll see what I'm talking about.
As a white nationalist, I respect other people's rights to have an identity. That is where the difference lies. Most white nationalist didn't want to invade Iraq. And they're usually staunchly against aggression towards Iran.
A true nationalist wants to be left alone. The Germans didn't have a massive empire like the Brits, yet they got raped twice in the 20th century and still carry the juden albatross.
You want a world beyond identity. That just isn't the world we live in. Fish fight for their tide-pools, rams fight for mates, red ants fight black ants. You have eyes. You see this, do you not? The red ants certainly did not pick up their red ant loyalties from the jews.
I admire how much of a sensitive soul you seem to be--Always caring about the plights of the less fortunate and wanting justice for the violence of the brute. But, sad to say, you're just never going to tamp it all down. We are in a universe where oppositional forces are forever at war. People and animals group together not only to be hostile to the outgroup. They band together for their own survival in a cruel world. They band together because they make the same shape in the flux of chaos. Why else do geese fly in a "V"? They don't let crows and bats fly in formation with them. That's the daydream of a child, not something from the natural world.
"As a white nationalist, I respect other people's rights to have an identity. That is where the difference lies. Most white nationalist didn't want to invade Iraq. And they're usually staunchly against aggression towards Iran."
ReplyDeleteSo do you then admit that British colonialism was even worse than invading Iraq? Do you agree that those who historically failed to respect others' identities cannot ask that their own be respected?
"A true nationalist wants to be left alone."
You as an individual may say that, but history shows that as soon as a racial identity is established and capable, it seeks to expand itself (that is also what Nietzsche would predict, and you claimed to be a Nietzschean). The British had an all-white Britain 500 years ago, and were not content; they colonized America, Africa, India, etc.. That is evidence that nationalism in reality leads to colonialism.
The Israelis claim they want to be left alone too, but do we believe them?
"Fish fight for their tide-pools, rams fight for mates, red ants fight black ants. You have eyes. You see this, do you not? The red ants certainly did not pick up their red ant loyalties from the jews."
Precisely. Which is why nationalism will not work. Fish will not stay in 'their part' of the tide pool. Red ants and black ants will not stay in 'their part' of the land. Your idea that "if everyone became nationalists, everyone would leave each other alone" is MORE of a daydream than my ideas. At least I recognize that divisive identity is the SOURCE of conflict.
"you're just never going to tamp it all down"
Look at Islam. They fight their enemies too. But the big difference is, they let ANYONE CONVERT. They don't see race at all; a Muslim is a Muslim, and the more Muslims of different races the better. The effect of conversion is similar to the effect of mixing races: the slate is cleaned, and people are united. It works. And this is why Jews are terrified of Islam, so much so that Jews are actually promoting nationalism and nationalist parties in Europe just to attack Islam. What does this tell you about racially divisive ideas such as nationalism compared to racially unifying ideas such as Islam in terms of their threat to Jewish control?
And you still believe Jews want people to blend? No, they want the opposite: people to be divided by racial identities, so Jews can continue to play one off against the other as they have done for thousands of years. That is what is happening right now.
"They band together because they make the same shape in the flux of chaos."
Precisely. And the people I band with are the non-racists of every race. They are the ones who make the same shape as me in the flux of chaos.
I knew you were a worthless muslim, no converting to islam means becoming part of a backward violent society that will stagnate and be surpass by its superior neighbors. And you have no idea how racist muslim are, hell the arabic word for blacks means slave. No only that but there are endless tribal divisions and conflicts between them. So what you're saying about islam is nonsense.
ReplyDeleteThat being said no living thing wants its group to go extinct and what you are calling for is genocide and extinction through race mixing and sterilisation.
You are blinded by ideology and ignore the fundamental nature of all living things. You cannot change human nature and as such you will never convince the different peoples of the world to commit suicide in this way, hell even most leftist true believers don't actually race mix all they do is merely talk a good game to show how "progressive" they are in their endless status competition with other leftist.