From Apple.com on September 3rd. Statistically, the coincidental pairing of black men and white women would be a rarity in the United States where black men make up about 7% of the population whereas White women make up roughly 30%. Therein it seems a deliberate action on the behalf of media corporations to constantly portray this combination with ill intent.
You know one of my best days that i had is when my daughter came home from school and introduced us to her boyfriend...
ReplyDeleteA WHITE MAN.... Thank GOD!!!
And to the Media corporations....... Please stop shoving us this B.S. About black men and white women .
LC
"it seems a deliberate action on the behalf of media corporations to constantly portray this combination with ill intent."
ReplyDeleteHow else do you propose the ad shows that the product is being marketed across ethnicities and genders? (If both models are the same gender, viewers might assume it is a male-only or female-only product. If both models are the same ethnicity, viewers might assume it is a black-only or white-only product.)
Also, depicting dark-skinned men with light-skinned women is an aesthetic tradition which is known to look good visually.
http://www.beazley.ox.ac.uk/dictionary/Dict/image/dionysos2.jpg
http://classes.bnf.fr/heros/images/3/003.jpg
http://www.minervaclassics.com/amasis1.jpg
http://w3.coh.arizona.edu/classes/mskinner/clas362/class362slides/athens2.JPG
Or did the Ancient Greeks have "ill intent" as well?
OK, if you want to market across etnicities, why not show an asian woman with a black male or a turbaned indian man with a black woman ? We never ever see those combos, now do we ? The jew wants to mongrelize the white race and therefore only shows the racial combo show in the ad.
ReplyDeleteStatistically Asian female / White male intermarriages are far more common than black male / white female relationships, yet incongruously the media refuses to advertise said relationships, as though they do not exist at all; the particularities of this may have to with the lesser taboo of the act. Asians comprise a significant enough portion of our population. Why do they never show up in popular media to the extent that blacks do?
ReplyDeleteThe common trend, here, is that the white woman / black male pairing is the most promoted / celebrated / encouraged across all media boards, at the expense of other interracial and intraracial relations.
"Statistically Asian female / White male intermarriages are far more common than black male / white female relationships, yet incongruously the media refuses to advertise said relationships, as though they do not exist at all"
ReplyDeleteActually these are portrayed in Hollywood movies a lot:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0865556/board/thread/115083821
Can you find this many Hollywood movies with black man white woman pairs?
Ads are different from movies; they need to make their point quickly. The black man white woman pair is most suitable for this due to the greater variation in skin color. (And the reason they don't use white man black woman is the aesthetic reason discussed above.)
Nice try at apologia but you are willfully blind. The constant, deliberate irritant of big blacks with petite blondes is nothing more than the Marxist leverage of postbellum revenge fantasies of black slaves screwing Massa's womenfolk.
ReplyDeleteOf course, the Marxist/Bolshevik contingent doesn't really care either way but they know it is a potent, deeply instinctual affront, a deliberate provocation.
It works.
Time is short however. We shall have fewer Americans but better Americans, to borrow Stalin if I may. Those White women that throw away their genetic heritage are likely defective in a way we do not scientifically understand but is obvious from the "neural network" of the survival instinct.
The problem is that many healthy but young and naive White girls are pressured into this bestial behaviour and then we lose their progeny for all time.
No matter. If the mean Black IQ in America is 85 (borderline retardation), even with a few percent of White miscegenation by our own lower-threshold women, the net benefit to them will be negligible. We however will have a better herd for the culling; they will simply have more mixing and the frustration and hatred it spawns for their want of an identity.
race doesnt exist, we are ALL human!
ReplyDelete@anonymous September 3, 2010 2:23 PM
ReplyDelete"If both models are the same ethnicity, viewers might assume it is a black-only or white-only product."
I've never heard of a "white-only" or "black-only" mp3 player. LOL!
No, you're wrong, no normal person would look at this ad and say "oh, this electronic device is meant for both black and white people." Saying that is retardedly literal - no one is that stupid. If you really want to go down that road, the most literal (and equally retarded) interpretation is to say, "this device is for people in interracial relationships." But of course most people aren't going to say that either.
What most people will think is, "here's yet another ad for a trendy product that's aimed at youth and which uses interracial relationships, specifically white women with black men, as something "cool" and "hip."
And they would be right - that is exactly what's going on here. To show two white kids would be "too white" - god forbid we can't have that in this day and age. To show two of some sort of non-white group (two blacks, two asians, two whatevers), well that's "too ethnic." But to show a black guy with a white girl. That's juuuust right.
Never mind the fact that the vast majority of people date and couple with people of their own racial group - this isn't about reality. It's about perceptions of what's "cool" in popular consciousness, or, to be more specific, what a small number of upper middle class, mostly white liberal (and also heavily Jewish) advertising hacks decide is "cool" in popular consciousness. After all, we all know that advertising's job is to create desire. Manipulating and even contriving conceptions of what's cool is a well-known part of that process. Whether people want it or not.
Thanks for coming up with this Site. The blatant anti White commercials sicken me.
ReplyDeleteIn almost every one, the black is put in the role as the superior person. The Dr. ,Cop, Scientist etc.
While they're helping some poor wretched White person. And the White's are portrayed as weak, stupid, unatractive fools.
I would like to find out who these Ad Agencies are and bring lawsuits against them.
And yes Anonymous RACE does exist! True we're all the human species and then that species is broken down into different races.
If someone could please let me know how I can help in sueing these Ad Agencies. Thank You.
"Thanks for coming up with this Site. The blatant anti White commercials sicken me.
ReplyDeleteIn almost every one, the black is put in the role as the superior person. The Dr. ,Cop, Scientist etc.
While they're helping some poor wretched White person. And the White's are portrayed as weak, stupid, unatractive fools.
I would like to find out who these Ad Agencies are and bring lawsuits against them.
And yes Anonymous RACE does exist! True we're all the human species and then that species is broken down into different races.
If someone could please let me know how I can help in sueing these Ad Agencies. Thank You. "
You're going to sue them because they have a Black person playing a doctor or cop and helping a White person? Are you kidding? LOL.
Good luck with that.
Suck it up and get over it.
ReplyDeleteIt's not that they have a Black playing a Dr. or Cop or something. It's that they almost ALWAYS have the Black person in the more superior role. As they Whites play the fool ( Which is pretty fitting ) or the criminal, or the wreck.
ReplyDeleteAs well as non Whites being placed in a disproportionate amount in Ads.
America has been taken from Whites. It's our own fault but it wasn't suppose to be this way.
The U.S. Constitution states this Country was made for us and OUR posterity. That would be Whites. Not someone from Kenya or Columbia.
The Naturalization Acts of 1790 & 1795 state that in order to be a U.S. citizen. You have to be WHITE.
That's the Founding Fathers that wrote that.
Non Whites need to go back to where ever it is they came from. It's that simple.
So No I don't think I'll just ' suck it up.'
I think I'll start filing laws suits.
"The Naturalization Acts of 1790 & 1795 state that in order to be a U.S. citizen. You have to be WHITE."
ReplyDeleteHence the Fourteenth Amendment 1868.
"That's the Founding Fathers that wrote that."
The Founding Fathers also had no problem with slavery. So are we supposed to reinstate slavery?
"Non Whites need to go back to where ever it is they came from. It's that simple."
If they were born in the US, the US is where they come from. You try convincing another country that it is responsible for taking in Americans who happen to be non-white and see what they think of your idea.
The fourteenth amendment was a huge mistake. Lincoln intended to send free slaves either back to Africa or to the Caribbean.
ReplyDeleteI'm pretty sure that most of the Founding Fathers were opposed to slavery. Most Americans were opposed to slavery.
Less than 10% of Americans owned salves. 2% of those were freed slaves.
Please don't misunderstand me. I don't care if a persons black or white or red or yellow.
My belief is that the races are to be separate Nations. And America was instituted for Whites.
You mentioned convincing another country to take people in. Well we did it with Liberia.
The U.S. purchased the land I believe and sent freed slaves back to Africa. You know Liberia
' Liberty ' the capital is Monrovia named after Pres. Monroe.
Whites have been robbed of our heritage. What was rightly to be ours.
There's a country in Africa right now that has no government. So it's doable.
Your right about some of this. It'll probably never happen. I'm just saying that it isn't the way it was intended or suppose to be.
White stupidity and the Zionist are mostly to blame.
Yes, I know about Liberia. If people today want to VOLUNTARILY emigrate there from the US, and Liberia is willing to take them, that is fine with me. What I'm against is FORCING anyone born in the US to leave (and yes, that includes using unofficial bullying tactics to make their lives in the US so miserable that they will want to leave).
ReplyDeleteZionists want the races to fight with each other so that they can play both sides and influence the outcome. A multiracial society would be of no advantage to the Zionists if only the different races stopped viewing themselves as separate from each other. When Zionists push "diversity", they are actually promoting separation. (This is why Zionists villify Islam so much, because Islam has a track record of uniting all races under its banner.) I don't support "diversity" or separation; I support mixing and integration.
Zionists dont villify Islam as much because thy dont hate and fear muslims they way they hate and fear whites. Promoting Islam is an attack on white countries. Plus the fears of low ranking jews for Islam helps keep them in line too.
ReplyDeleteYou must have been living under a rock this last decade if you think Muslims have not been BY FAR the most villified group in the Jewish-controlled media.
ReplyDeleteWhite countries created Israel. White countries gave Israel nukes. White countries bomb Israel's enemies. And you want me to believe Zionists have any reason to attack white countries? Ridiculous. No, the moment white countries stop existing, Israel will stop existing as well, and every Jew knows this. White countries have always been the Zionists' attack dogs, and the Zionists are going to do everything in their power to keep their attack dogs alive and angry.
negroids don't even deserve to be slaves. they are pure savages. they are lucky to be descent of american slaves. or they would end up as negro slaveworkers in the poorest, darkest,most corrupt african jungle.
ReplyDeleteMuslims have not been BY FAR the most villified group in the Jewish-controlled media.
ReplyDeleteYes, divide and rule. But note that anytime anyone actually tries to do something. Stop them immigrating, sending them home, jewish groups are the first to man the defences.
In Britain a group called the English Defence League shows anti-Islamic tendencies and has tried to ally itself with jews. What do jewish groups do? They condemn the EDL and ally themselves with muslim groups.
In Switzerland there was a vote to ban minarets. Not actual mosques. Not muslims. Just minarets. A very feeble stirring of self defence by whites. So what did the jews do, the ones who stirred up the hate? They sided with the muslims obviously.
Of course they encourage the hate, but if the muslims went home what use would that be?
White countries created Israel.
No jewish influence there of course.
White countries gave Israel nukes.
"Gave?" or did Isral steal them?
White countries bomb Israel's enemies.
Again, no jewish influence there of course.
the moment white countries stop existing, Israel will stop existing as well, and every Jew knows this
I think they do but their hatred and fear of us is so great thy ant help thmselves.
They couldnt stop themselvs making the Spanish hate them - hence the Inquisition.
They couldnt stop themselves making the Germans hate them - hence the nazis.
Andd so on throughout history.
White countries have always been the Zionists' attack dogs, and the Zionists are going to do everything in their power to keep their attack dogs alive and angry.
Ooops! Gave yourself away there. By making it clear who the dogs are and therefore who the handlers are the true power relationship is exposed. Thus invalidating your arlier claims.
"Yes, divide and rule. But note that anytime anyone actually tries to do something. Stop them immigrating, sending them home, jewish groups are the first to man the defences."
ReplyDeleteNo, Jews are the ones trying to stop them immigrating and trying to deport them. Geert Wilders of the PVV is a Jew. The Ekeroth brothers of the SD are Jews. Gerhard Kurzmann of the FPO is a Jew. All the nationalist groups in Europe are Zionist fronts.
"In Britain a group called the English Defence League shows anti-Islamic tendencies and has tried to ally itself with jews. What do jewish groups do? They condemn the EDL and ally themselves with muslim groups."
Rubbish. The EDL has a Jewish division.
"No jewish influence there of course."
"Ooops! Gave yourself away there. By making it clear who the dogs are and therefore who the handlers are the true power relationship is exposed. Thus invalidating your arlier claims."
Of course there was Jewish influence! Of course Zionists are the handlers and white countries are the dogs! That's my point! White countries will do anything Jews want them to do. Therefore the most reliable solution to end Jewish power is to have no white countries. To preserve white countries is to preserve Zionism. It is that simple.
@Anonymous October 2, 2010 10:51 PM
ReplyDelete"Therefore the most reliable solution to end Jewish power is to have no white countries. To preserve white countries is to preserve Zionism. It is that simple."
This is quite possibly the stupidest thing I've ever seen written on the internet. Quite an accomplishment, well done.
Miscegenation is disgusting. Not even zoophilia is as nauseating.
ReplyDeleteChristians support Zionism, not whites. Whites had their own religions once, until Judeo-Christianity and Judeo-Islam destroyed all of their pre-Christian religions and forced them to accept a variant of Judaism. If the Pope came out in support of attacking Iran tomorrow, rest assured the hundreds of million of mestizos in Latin America will come to the aid of the Jews.
ReplyDeleteThe Jews brought the Muslims to the West to begin with. They are responsible for Islamic terror. Wilders is not a Jew, neither is Kurzmann. The reason why some nationalist groups are zionists, is because they are Christians. You will also find Christians in Africa and Latin America supportive of Israel by the same token.
The (preferably Catholic and Protestant) Christian and (preferably Sunni) Islamic countries will do anything the Jews ask of them. That is why the Sunni Arab leadership believes that Iran should be attacked and not Israel in private. Both Islam and Christianity have long since catered to Jewish political and financial interests. The Jews were saved multiple times over by the Islamic world. The Jews and Muslims would also on occupation ally with the Muslims to kill Christians during the caliphate. Seeing as how Islam is the ultimate form of goyim submission to Judaism (i.e circumcision, dietary restrictions, prayer rituals, etc), the Jews have preferred Islam to Christianity through-out the ages. To end all Jewish power Christianity and Islam would have to be destroyed first, seeing as how before Christianity and Islam the Jews were an utterly irrelevant force of nomadic thieves and small-time traders. Christianity and Islam (religions created for slaves by the Romans and Arabs in cooperation with the Jews, respectively), promoted Jewish status in society to people of the book or chosen people, while all non-Jewish religions were decimated.
"Zionists dont villify Islam as much because thy dont hate and fear muslims they way they hate and fear whites. Promoting Islam is an attack on white countries. Plus the fears of low ranking jews for Islam helps keep them in line too."
ReplyDeleteThat's too true. The admitted goal of international, Jewish groups such as united nations and EU is the ending of European nationalism. When they complete the perversion and destruction of European races by flooding their lands with millions more immigrants, they wont have to worry about authentic, natural leaders such as those of Nationalist Germany in the thirties who threatened international Jew interests.
"Christians support Zionism, not whites. Whites had their own religions once, until Judeo-Christianity and Judeo-Islam destroyed all of their pre-Christian religions and forced them to accept a variant of Judaism."
The false, malicious expression "judeo-christianity" didn't even exist before jewish mass media. It simply cannot be found in writing.
Anonymous said...
"it seems a deliberate action on the behalf of media corporations to constantly portray this combination with ill intent."
How else do you propose the ad shows that the product is being marketed across ethnicities and genders? (If both models are the same gender, viewers might assume it is a male-only or female-only product. If both models are the same ethnicity, viewers might assume it is a black-only or white-only product.)
" Also, depicting dark-skinned men with light-skinned women is an aesthetic tradition which is known to look good visually.
http://www.beazley.ox.ac.uk/dictionary/Dict/image/dionysos2.jpg
http://classes.bnf.fr/heros/images/3/003.jpg
http://www.minervaclassics.com/amasis1.jpg
http://w3.coh.arizona.edu/classes/mskinner/clas362/class362slides/athens2.JPG
Or did the Ancient Greeks have "ill intent" as well?"
that's ridiculous. you must be a trolling cuckold. the darkness wasn't for an aesthetic. the non-human, earthy, black coloration can easily be seen as a way of distinguishing an immortal from realistically colored humans. you are cherry picking too as Dionysos, the son of Zeus, is usually colored as greeks were.
anyway, how many blacks do you think were interacting with jews at the last bilderberg meeting?
This IS very annoying. And believe me I am Joe white guy, apple would have no idea a regular Joe like me would be bothered by this, well guess what I am. So much so to the point I will likely get a android based phone. I mean really, it's the same BS with their tablet marketing.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, the answer on WHY they do it, is because some marketing genius has determined that white females and black males are the ones that make purchasing decisions for the household, so let's advertise to them. Additionally there is this thought that, or I'm sure somebody can point to a study, that says white females and black males are more care free with there money...Well a big F U Apple, guess who is going to buy a motorola with android...this guy. You can make all the assumptions you want about me, but I promise you, I am a professional white male, with a high income job...etc. not some bitter redneck.